Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix translation string in motioneye #128403

Closed

Conversation

j4n-e4t
Copy link
Contributor

@j4n-e4t j4n-e4t commented Oct 14, 2024

Breaking change

Proposed change

Add missing translation string to motioneye integration.
Links to #127811

Type of change

  • Dependency upgrade
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New integration (thank you!)
  • New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
  • Deprecation (breaking change to happen in the future)
  • Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
  • Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Additional information

Checklist

  • The code change is tested and works locally.
  • Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
  • There is no commented out code in this PR.
  • I have followed the development checklist
  • I have followed the perfect PR recommendations
  • The code has been formatted using Ruff (ruff format homeassistant tests)
  • Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

  • The manifest file has all fields filled out correctly.
    Updated and included derived files by running: python3 -m script.hassfest.
  • New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt.
    Updated by running python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all.
  • For the updated dependencies - a link to the changelog, or at minimum a diff between library versions is added to the PR description.

To help with the load of incoming pull requests:

@home-assistant
Copy link

Hey there @dermotduffy, mind taking a look at this pull request as it has been labeled with an integration (motioneye) you are listed as a code owner for? Thanks!

Code owner commands

Code owners of motioneye can trigger bot actions by commenting:

  • @home-assistant close Closes the pull request.
  • @home-assistant rename Awesome new title Renames the pull request.
  • @home-assistant reopen Reopen the pull request.
  • @home-assistant unassign motioneye Removes the current integration label and assignees on the pull request, add the integration domain after the command.
  • @home-assistant add-label needs-more-information Add a label (needs-more-information, problem in dependency, problem in custom component) to the pull request.
  • @home-assistant remove-label needs-more-information Remove a label (needs-more-information, problem in dependency, problem in custom component) on the pull request.

Copy link
Contributor

@epenet epenet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this might be a false-positive
I think SOURCE_HASSIO should be a discovery source, and there is no need for this... so I opened #128454

@home-assistant
Copy link

Please take a look at the requested changes, and use the Ready for review button when you are done, thanks 👍

Learn more about our pull request process.

@home-assistant home-assistant bot marked this pull request as draft October 15, 2024 14:42
@j4n-e4t j4n-e4t marked this pull request as ready for review October 15, 2024 15:08
@home-assistant home-assistant bot requested a review from epenet October 15, 2024 15:08
@j4n-e4t
Copy link
Contributor Author

j4n-e4t commented Oct 15, 2024

I think this might be a false-positive I think SOURCE_HASSIO should be a discovery source, and there is no need for this... so I opened #128454

Should we close this then?

@epenet
Copy link
Contributor

epenet commented Oct 15, 2024

I think this might be a false-positive I think SOURCE_HASSIO should be a discovery source, and there is no need for this... so I opened #128454

Should we close this then?

Let's wait and see if #128454 is approved.
If it is, then this one can be closed - if not then we can get it reviewed again.

@epenet epenet marked this pull request as draft October 15, 2024 15:11
@j4n-e4t
Copy link
Contributor Author

j4n-e4t commented Oct 15, 2024

btw didn't mean to reopen... 😔

@epenet
Copy link
Contributor

epenet commented Oct 16, 2024

Closing as #128454 has been accepted

@epenet epenet closed this Oct 16, 2024
@j4n-e4t j4n-e4t deleted the j4n-e4t/translations-motioneye branch October 16, 2024 13:29
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 17, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants