-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update restore logic to allow Resource Modifiers to use data from the status field #8121
Open
BaudouinH
wants to merge
4
commits into
vmware-tanzu:main
Choose a base branch
from
BaudouinH:allow-usage-of-status-field-in-resource-modifiers
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
Change restore flow to allow resourceModifiers to use status field in their patches. |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -58,6 +58,11 @@ resourceModifierRules: | |
- copy | ||
- test (covered below) | ||
|
||
### Limitations of Resource Modifiers | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Can you please move limitations section to the bottom of the docs? |
||
|
||
Resource modifiers cannot patch the status field of a resource. The patch will not be taken into account when doing so. | ||
However, resource modifiers patch can use values from the status field of a resource to patch other fields. | ||
|
||
### Advanced scenarios | ||
#### **Conditional patches using test operation** | ||
The `test` operation can be used to check if a particular value is present in the resource. If the value is present, the patch will be applied. If the value is not present, the patch will not be applied. This can be used to apply a patch only if a particular value is present in the resource. For example, if you wish to change the storage class of a PVC only if the PVC is using a particular storage class, you can use the following configmap. | ||
|
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the concern that @reasonerjt had in #8094 (comment) still holds.
Please pitch in others - CC: @sseago, if this could impact any RIA flows.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Otherwise please signoff - @reasonerjt
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@anshulahuja98 I'm unaware of any RIA that currently modifies status -- if I'm remembering correctly, don't we currently strip the status field before RIAs are run? I think that's one of the reasons we added unmodified item (
itemFromBackup
) to the RIA input, as it still has the full status available for plugins to reference.