-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 163
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
call rcl content filter fallback #996
base: rolling
Are you sure you want to change the base?
call rcl content filter fallback #996
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Chen Lihui <[email protected]>
@clalancette @wjwwood about fallback filtering in rcl, that requires new repository ros2/rcl_content_filter_fallback#1, I will be working on the review. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
1st review completed.
Co-authored-by: Tomoya.Fujita <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Chen Lihui <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chen Lihui <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chen Lihui <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chen Lihui <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chen Lihui <[email protected]>
…back_to_content_filter Signed-off-by: Chen Lihui <[email protected]>
Try CI for 6 PRs mentioned in #996 (comment) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@iuhilnehc-ynos overall lgtm, i still think we should not use DDS
, how about replacing those into RMW implementation
?
rcl/src/rcl/subscription.c
Outdated
// Content filter topic not supported (or not enabled as some failed cases) on rmw | ||
// implementation. | ||
// TODO(iuhilnehc-ynos): enable rcl content filter fallback with an environment variable | ||
// (e.g. FORCE_COMMON_CONTENT_FILTER) regardless of whether cft is enabled on DDS. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
// (e.g. FORCE_COMMON_CONTENT_FILTER) regardless of whether cft is enabled on DDS. | |
// (e.g. FORCE_COMMON_CONTENT_FILTER) regardless of whether cft is enabled on RMW implementation. |
rcl/test/rcl/test_subscription.cpp
Outdated
bool is_cft_support = | ||
(std::string(rmw_get_implementation_identifier()).find("rmw_connextdds") == 0 || | ||
std::string(rmw_get_implementation_identifier()).find("rmw_fastrtps_cpp") == 0); | ||
// rcl CFT will be the fallback if rmw CFT is unsupported on DDS |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
// rcl CFT will be the fallback if rmw CFT is unsupported on DDS | |
// rcl CFT will be the fallback if rmw CFT is unsupported on implementation |
You're right. we should not let users know something about DDS information in |
Signed-off-by: Chen Lihui <[email protected]>
…back_to_content_filter
Signed-off-by: Chen Lihui [email protected]