Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change indirect index logic #105

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 22, 2024
Merged

Conversation

taichi-ishitani
Copy link
Member

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 22, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (1c53247) to head (35c1a10).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #105   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          176       176           
  Lines        10976     10991   +15     
=========================================
+ Hits         10976     10991   +15     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

@taichi-ishitani taichi-ishitani force-pushed the change_indirect_index_logic branch from 05acbfc to 22229c2 Compare November 22, 2024 05:36
@taichi-ishitani taichi-ishitani force-pushed the change_indirect_index_logic branch from 22229c2 to 35c1a10 Compare November 22, 2024 05:39
Copy link

codeclimate bot commented Nov 22, 2024

Code Climate has analyzed commit 35c1a10 and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

View more on Code Climate.

@taichi-ishitani taichi-ishitani merged commit 5b0e669 into master Nov 22, 2024
19 checks passed
@taichi-ishitani taichi-ishitani deleted the change_indirect_index_logic branch November 22, 2024 07:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant