-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Custom playlist music order was ignored. Queue music by filter and collection. #30343
Open
wezwery
wants to merge
12
commits into
ppy:master
Choose a base branch
from
wezwery:music-player-queue-by-results
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+33
−4
Open
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5c23a2c
Fixed a bug where custom playlist music order was ignored.
wezwery 814d2ed
Return BeatmapSets visibility to private.
wezwery 9ee8e4f
Removed nullable from IEnumerable<Live<BeatmapSetInfo>>
wezwery 854a412
Formatting code and change equals methods.
wezwery aa57ca3
Add Playlist to MusicController. It seems to work.
wezwery 7b989b5
Code formatting. Calling a method once per frame.
wezwery 1916990
Register a realm notification for beatmaps changes. Tests seem to work.
wezwery a75ad5c
Added empty playlist checks to other tests in TestSceneMusicActionHan…
wezwery 42d712b
Remove bad code. Add beatmapsets to MusicController.Playlist when Pla…
wezwery 0fcd5e7
Adding spaces
wezwery d4aaa86
Get all beatmap sets when playlist is empty
wezwery bd467a6
Code Quality fix
wezwery File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So I was skeptical that this did anything, in particular that this will support reordering items correctly, and yet... it does? It does because every reorder of items in the list calls
OnItemsChanged()
, and everyOnItemsChanged()
for this container callsFilter()
. And thus the list is cleared and re-populated anew on every item reorder.Stress-testing it on a huge database (~230MB) it is pretty visible in there, although maybe not as much as I'd actually expect it to be after inferring the above:
@ppy/team-client am I the only one who has a problem with this? The code is otherwise (deceptively?) simple and it appears to work correctly...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bdach if you think it's okay then i'm fine with the simple approach until someone complains about performance.