You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Should be done after #8847
When a user has an objective, everest expects there to be a file output from the forward model called: objective. It would be good to have an option where Everest can try to validate.
One option is to do this by checking the forward model section for arguments called objective and give a warning as well as a path to resolution, however that is likely to miss a lot of cases, and not be very robust.
Another option is to have some validation hooks where the forward model gets access to the everest objective section and can validate against it.
For this we could introduce a new forward model type, for example called: objective_function_forward_model, that would get access to the relevant path of the everest config though a plugin hook at startup.
oyvindeide
changed the title
Try to validate that controls are correctly specified
Try to validate that objectives are correctly specified
Sep 12, 2024
Should be done after #8847
When a user has an
objective
,everest
expects there to be a file output from the forward model called:objective
. It would be good to have an option where Everest can try to validate.One option is to do this by checking the forward model section for arguments called
objective
and give a warning as well as a path to resolution, however that is likely to miss a lot of cases, and not be very robust.Another option is to have some validation hooks where the forward model gets access to the everest objective section and can validate against it.
objective_function_forward_model
, that would get access to the relevant path of the everest config though a plugin hook at startup.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: