Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add warning when everest-models file outputs do not match everest objectives #9120

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

DanSava
Copy link
Contributor

@DanSava DanSava commented Oct 31, 2024

Issue
Resolves #8757

(Screenshot of new behavior in GUI if applicable)

  • PR title captures the intent of the changes, and is fitting for release notes.
  • Added appropriate release note label
  • Commit history is consistent and clean, in line with the contribution guidelines.
  • Make sure unit tests pass locally after every commit (git rebase -i main --exec 'pytest tests/ert/unit_tests -n logical -m "not integration_test"')

When applicable

  • When there are user facing changes: Updated documentation
  • New behavior or changes to existing untested code: Ensured that unit tests are added (See Ground Rules).
  • Large PR: Prepare changes in small commits for more convenient review
  • Bug fix: Add regression test for the bug
  • Bug fix: Create Backport PR to latest release

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 31, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.69%. Comparing base (90d11ec) to head (b7f8fe8).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #9120      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.81%   90.69%   -0.13%     
==========================================
  Files         351      351              
  Lines       21895    21889       -6     
==========================================
- Hits        19884    19852      -32     
- Misses       2011     2037      +26     
Flag Coverage Δ
cli-tests 39.17% <ø> (-0.07%) ⬇️
gui-tests 71.79% <ø> (+0.05%) ⬆️
performance-tests 49.42% <ø> (+0.05%) ⬆️
unit-tests 79.65% <ø> (-0.05%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@DanSava DanSava force-pushed the everest_objective_validation branch 4 times, most recently from a4c280f to d378902 Compare November 4, 2024 13:36
@DanSava DanSava force-pushed the everest_objective_validation branch from d378902 to b7f8fe8 Compare November 4, 2024 13:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Try to validate that objectives are correctly specified
2 participants