Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Set inital signers #971

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Aug 1, 2024
Merged

Set inital signers #971

merged 6 commits into from
Aug 1, 2024

Conversation

JesseAbram
Copy link
Member

@JesseAbram JesseAbram commented Jul 31, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Related #941

  • Set inital signers in jumpstart call
  • Remove SIGNING_PARTY_SIZE

@JesseAbram JesseAbram marked this pull request as ready for review July 31, 2024 22:21
ameba23
ameba23 approved these changes Aug 1, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@ameba23 ameba23 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💯 looks great. we can close #969

crates/threshold-signature-server/src/validator/api.rs Outdated
@@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ pub async fn new_reshare(
.any(|validator_info| validator_info.tss_account == *signer.account_id());

if !is_proper_signer {
dbg!("not proper");
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Either remove or change to tracing::warn or whatever

pallets/staking/src/lib.rs Outdated
NextSigners::<T>::put(NextSignerInfo {
next_signers: self.inital_signers.clone(),
next_signers: self.mock_signer_rotate.clone().1,
confirmations: vec![],
});

ReshareData::<T>::put(ReshareInfo {
// To give enough time for test_reshare setup
block_number: TEST_RESHARE_BLOCK_NUMBER.into(),
// Alice signer public key
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure if this comment should stay - is it still always alice here?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no you are right

pallets/staking/src/lib.rs Outdated
@@ -199,11 +199,10 @@ pub mod pallet {
#[derive(DefaultNoBound)]
pub struct GenesisConfig<T: Config> {
pub threshold_servers: Vec<ThresholdServersConfig<T>>,
pub inital_signers: Vec<T::ValidatorId>,
/// validator info and accounts to take part in proactive refresh
pub proactive_refresh_data: (Vec<ValidatorInfo>, Vec<Vec<u8>>),
/// validator info and account to take part in a reshare
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This doccoment could be improved because its not very clear what the second and third things in the tuple are.

It looks like the first one is the set of initial signers, and the second one is the first new next signer which will be chosen. But i am not sure why it is a vec if we only ever use the first element.

crates/shared/src/constants.rs
@@ -33,8 +33,6 @@ lazy_static! {
pub static ref DEVICE_KEY_AUX_DATA_TYPE: Vec<u8> = vec![123, 34, 36, 115, 99, 104, 101, 109, 97, 34, 58, 34, 104, 116, 116, 112, 58, 47, 47, 106, 115, 111, 110, 45, 115, 99, 104, 101, 109, 97, 46, 111, 114, 103, 47, 100, 114, 97, 102, 116, 45, 48, 55, 47, 115, 99, 104, 101, 109, 97, 35, 34, 44, 34, 116, 105, 116, 108, 101, 34, 58, 34, 65, 117, 120, 68, 97, 116, 97, 34, 44, 34, 100, 101, 115, 99, 114, 105, 112, 116, 105, 111, 110, 34, 58, 34, 74, 83, 79, 78, 32, 114, 101, 112, 114, 101, 115, 101, 110, 116, 97, 116, 105, 111, 110, 32, 111, 102, 32, 116, 104, 101, 32, 97, 117, 120, 105, 108, 105, 97, 114, 121, 32, 100, 97, 116, 97, 34, 44, 34, 116, 121, 112, 101, 34, 58, 34, 111, 98, 106, 101, 99, 116, 34, 44, 34, 114, 101, 113, 117, 105, 114, 101, 100, 34, 58, 91, 34, 99, 111, 110, 116, 101, 120, 116, 34, 44, 34, 112, 117, 98, 108, 105, 99, 95, 107, 101, 121, 34, 44, 34, 112, 117, 98, 108, 105, 99, 95, 107, 101, 121, 95, 116, 121, 112, 101, 34, 44, 34, 115, 105, 103, 110, 97, 116, 117, 114, 101, 34, 93, 44, 34, 112, 114, 111, 112, 101, 114, 116, 105, 101, 115, 34, 58, 123, 34, 99, 111, 110, 116, 101, 120, 116, 34, 58, 123, 34, 100, 101, 115, 99, 114, 105, 112, 116, 105, 111, 110, 34, 58, 34, 84, 104, 101, 32, 99, 111, 110, 116, 101, 120, 116, 32, 102, 111, 114, 32, 116, 104, 101, 32, 115, 105, 103, 110, 97, 116, 117, 114, 101, 32, 111, 110, 108, 121, 32, 110, 101, 101, 100, 101, 100, 32, 105, 110, 32, 115, 114, 50, 53, 53, 49, 57, 32, 115, 105, 103, 110, 97, 116, 117, 114, 101, 32, 116, 121, 112, 101, 34, 44, 34, 116, 121, 112, 101, 34, 58, 34, 115, 116, 114, 105, 110, 103, 34, 125, 44, 34, 112, 117, 98, 108, 105, 99, 95, 107, 101, 121, 34, 58, 123, 34, 100, 101, 115, 99, 114, 105, 112, 116, 105, 111, 110, 34, 58, 34, 98, 97, 115, 101, 54, 52, 45, 101, 110, 99, 111, 100, 101, 100, 32, 112, 117, 98, 108, 105, 99, 32, 107, 101, 121, 34, 44, 34, 116, 121, 112, 101, 34, 58, 34, 115, 116, 114, 105, 110, 103, 34, 125, 44, 34, 112, 117, 98, 108, 105, 99, 95, 107, 101, 121, 95, 116, 121, 112, 101, 34, 58, 123, 34, 100, 101, 115, 99, 114, 105, 112, 116, 105, 111, 110, 34, 58, 34, 92, 34, 101, 99, 100, 115, 97, 92, 34, 44, 32, 92, 34, 101, 100, 50, 53, 53, 49, 57, 92, 34, 44, 32, 92, 34, 115, 114, 50, 53, 53, 49, 57, 92, 34, 34, 44, 34, 116, 121, 112, 101, 34, 58, 34, 115, 116, 114, 105, 110, 103, 34, 125, 44, 34, 115, 105, 103, 110, 97, 116, 117, 114, 101, 34, 58, 123, 34, 100, 101, 115, 99, 114, 105, 112, 116, 105, 111, 110, 34, 58, 34, 98, 97, 115, 101, 54, 52, 45, 101, 110, 99, 111, 100, 101, 100, 32, 115, 105, 103, 110, 97, 116, 117, 114, 101, 34, 44, 34, 116, 121, 112, 101, 34, 58, 34, 115, 116, 114, 105, 110, 103, 34, 125, 125, 125];
}

pub const SIGNING_PARTY_SIZE: usize = 2;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

crates/threshold-signature-server/src/user/tests.rs
@@ -785,7 +785,7 @@ async fn test_jumpstart_network() {

// wait for jump start event check that key exists in kvdb
let mut got_jumpstart_event = false;
for _ in 0..45 {
for _ in 0..75 {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just to check - did you bump this when you were having some issue which you then resolved, or does the initial DKG just take longer as there are now 3 parties rather than 2.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ya I was getting some inconsistent failings in my last PR for this on the CI, I couldn't always hit it, so I added an assert statment here in the last PR and if I saw it again I would now have an error and know it was here

@ameba23 ameba23 mentioned this pull request Aug 1, 2024
Closed
@JesseAbram JesseAbram merged commit 704ada4 into master Aug 1, 2024
14 checks passed
@JesseAbram JesseAbram deleted the set-inital-signers branch August 1, 2024 15:57
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 1, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Reviewers

@ameba23 ameba23 ameba23 approved these changes

@HCastano HCastano Awaiting requested review from HCastano

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@JesseAbram @ameba23