deps(hugo): Upgrade to v0.102.3

[simar7]

Hold onto merging until peaceiris/actions-hugo#605 is merged.

Signed-off-by: Simar [email protected]

[simar7]

@DmitriyLewen since you are here, do you think we should at some point bump Hugo? I'm sure the newer versions would reduce build time thereby reducing GitHub Actions runner time.

[DmitriyLewen]

I used hugo v0.121.0 on my local PC to create a local site.
This still requires a lot of time and resources, but I haven't noticed any problems with the vulnerability pages.

So, I think we can try to bump hugo.

@simar7 But this PR is outdated.

[simar7]

I used hugo v0.121.0 on my local PC to create a local site.

This still requires a lot of time and resources, but I haven't noticed any problems with the vulnerability pages.

So, I think we can try to bump hugo.

@simar7 But this PR is outdated.

I see thanks for checking.

Did your local full build take less time with the recent version of Hugo?

[DmitriyLewen]

Did your local full build take less time with the recent version of Hugo?

I only worked with this version, but I can try to check.

[simar7]

Did your local full build take less time with the recent version of Hugo?

I only worked with this version, but I can try to check.

Did you have any update @DmitriyLewen

[DmitriyLewen]

Hello @simar7
Sorry, i was busy with other tasks.

I tried to check this, but my Mac killed hugo 😄 :

➜  time hugo --destination=docs      
Start building sites … 
hugo v0.121.0-e321c3502aa8e80a7a7c951359339a985f082757+extended darwin/arm64 BuildDate=2023-12-05T15:22:31Z VendorInfo=brew

[2]    70243 killed     hugo --destination=docs
hugo --destination=docs  522.21s user 382.57s system 112% cpu 13:25.25 total

I wanted to compare time in CI/CD of my fork, but hugo-action still didn't fix peaceiris/actions-hugo#605.
Latest possible version for MacOS is 0.101.0.

Do you have any info why we use macos runner to build site?

[DmitriyLewen]

I compare currently version with 0.101.0. 0.101.0 is faster:
0.81.0 worked 32 min and was killed - https://github.com/DmitriyLewen/avd-generator/actions/runs/9090148356/job/24982466479#step:18:8
0.101.0 created site for 28 min - https://github.com/DmitriyLewen/avd-generator/actions/runs/9090338993/job/24982997298#step:18:1

[nikpivkin]

@DmitriyLewen I tried to run site generation locally, but it eats up all my machine resources :)

[simar7]

Do you have any info why we use macos runner to build site?

@DmitriyLewen it actually used to be the case that the macOS runners were more powerful in compute and memory as compared to their linux counterparts. So we moved from linux to macOS.

But I just checked, it seems that the linux ones have also caught up and now actually offer more https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-github-hosted-runners/about-github-hosted-runners/about-github-hosted-runners#standard-github-hosted-runners-for-public-repositories. Also the latest Mac runners (macOS-14) are now M1 based instead of the older intel ones.

It would be worth to try out using both macOS-14 and the linux runners again.

[DmitriyLewen]

@DmitriyLewen I tried to run site generation locally, but it eats up all my machine resources :)

Same case 😞

It would be worth to try out using both macOS-14 and the linux runners again.

Let's try using Linux first.

[simar7]

Superseded by e5aaf2f