Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add configurations for Llama 3.1 models(Llama-3.1-8B and Llama-3.1-70B) #761

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Oct 22, 2024

Conversation

vatsalrathod16
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This PR introduces new configuration dictionaries for the Llama 3.1 models, specifically the 8B and 70B parameter versions.

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

Checklist:

  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have not rewritten tests relating to key interfaces which would affect backward compatibility

Comment on lines 158 to 160
"meta-llama/Llama-3.1-70B",
"meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B",
"Baidicoot/Othello-GPT-Transformer-Lens",
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We do also want to make sure we are including the Instruct version of the models. Those models are very popular in research. They should be relatively similar to add.

@bryce13950
Copy link
Collaborator

image

8b seems to be working perfectly!

@bryce13950
Copy link
Collaborator

My last commit should get the CI to pass. We need to add Instruct, but once that is done, we can close this out!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants