Clarify and extend org owner authority #61
+19
−18
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- The "such as" wording left it open to ambiguity as to whether it's only the listed items or also others (while proper English would imply the latter, I meant the former when I wrote this originally) - The former interpretation is unnecessarily restrictive, requiring further requests to increase authority whenever something new was being done. This change makes it very explicit that it's an exclusive list for individually-implementable changes (certain pre-approved changes and minimal-impact changes), while leaving _all_ other non-controversial and non-impactful changes up to the org owners, given two approvals.
infinisil
force-pushed
the
org-owner-authority-improved
branch
from
3397118 to
addc735
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I've been annoying the other org members with my complaints when we didn't follow the authority to the dot 😅
This was because:
This PR makes it very explicit that it's an exclusive list for individually-implementable changes (certain pre-approved changes and minimal-impact changes), while leaving all other non-controversial and non-impactful changes up to the org owners, given two approvals.
This should hopefully require less changes to this document in the future.