Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: per branch cache+concurrency #53

Merged

Conversation

innovaker
Copy link
Contributor

Protects the cache from competing workflow runs on a per branch basis.

Lets each branch manage its own cache.

PR: zmkfirmware#53
innovaker added a commit to innovaker/zmk-docker that referenced this pull request May 20, 2021
This is no longer necessary because the branch name was added.

PR: zmkfirmware#53
innovaker added a commit to innovaker/zmk-docker that referenced this pull request May 20, 2021
Protects the cache from competing workflow runs on a per branch basis.

PR: zmkfirmware#53
@innovaker innovaker force-pushed the feat/per-branch-cache+concurrency branch from 3eb2e52 to 00608f3 Compare May 20, 2021 21:32
@innovaker innovaker self-assigned this May 21, 2021
`dev` is longer necessary because the branch name was added.

PR: zmkfirmware#53
Protects the cache from competing workflow runs on a per branch basis.

PR: zmkfirmware#53
@innovaker innovaker force-pushed the feat/per-branch-cache+concurrency branch from 00608f3 to b0cbb6a Compare May 22, 2021 13:43
@innovaker innovaker merged commit 3a6b0f0 into zmkfirmware:main May 22, 2021
innovaker added a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2021
Lets each branch manage its own cache.

PR: #53
innovaker added a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2021
`dev` is longer necessary because the branch name was added.

PR: #53
@innovaker innovaker deleted the feat/per-branch-cache+concurrency branch May 22, 2021 14:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants