Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: refund unused tokens on revert #41

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

fadeev
Copy link
Member

@fadeev fadeev commented Jan 8, 2025

When a transfer fails, refund unused ZRC-20 tokens to the original sender on ZetaChain.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Enhanced error handling for cross-chain NFT and token transfers
    • Implemented asset recovery mechanism for failed cross-chain transactions
    • Improved transaction robustness by returning assets to the sender in case of transfer failures

@fadeev fadeev requested a review from a team as a code owner January 8, 2025 12:28
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 8, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces similar changes to two contracts: UniversalNFTCore and UniversalTokenCore. In both contracts, the onRevert function has been enhanced with a new conditional block that handles asset recovery in case of a cross-chain call failure. The modification ensures that if a non-zero amount of an asset is involved in a failed transaction, the assets are attempted to be transferred back to the original sender, with a specific error handling mechanism for transfer failures.

Changes

File Change Summary
contracts/nft/contracts/.../UniversalNFTCore.sol Added conditional asset recovery logic in onRevert function
contracts/token/contracts/.../UniversalTokenCore.sol Added conditional asset recovery logic in onRevert function

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Sender
    participant Contract
    participant AssetToken

    Sender->>Contract: Initiate Cross-Chain Transaction
    Contract->>Contract: Transaction Fails
    alt Asset Recovery Conditions Met
        Contract->>AssetToken: Transfer Asset Back to Sender
        alt Transfer Fails
            Contract->>Contract: Revert with TransferFailed Error
        else Transfer Succeeds
            AssetToken->>Sender: Asset Returned
        end
    end
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • lumtis
  • 0xM3R

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@fadeev fadeev linked an issue Jan 8, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
contracts/nft/contracts/zetachain/UniversalNFTCore.sol (1)

267-272: LGTM! Consistent implementation with UniversalTokenCore.

The implementation correctly handles gas token refunds during cross-chain NFT transfer failures, maintaining consistency with the token contract's behavior.

Consider extracting this common revert handling logic into a shared library to maintain consistency and reduce code duplication between NFT and Token contracts.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9b99ad6 and 7dbe453.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • contracts/nft/contracts/zetachain/UniversalNFTCore.sol (1 hunks)
  • contracts/token/contracts/zetachain/UniversalTokenCore.sol (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: test (contracts/token)
  • GitHub Check: test (contracts/nft)
  • GitHub Check: slither (contracts/token, token.sarif)
  • GitHub Check: slither (contracts/nft, nft.sarif)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
contracts/token/contracts/zetachain/UniversalTokenCore.sol (1)

252-257: LGTM! Important fix for token recovery.

The added code properly handles the refund of unused tokens during cross-chain revert scenarios, preventing tokens from being locked in the contract.

Let's verify the token recovery implementation in other similar contracts:

✅ Verification successful

Token recovery implementation verified across contracts

The same token recovery pattern is correctly implemented in both UniversalTokenCore and UniversalNFTCore contracts, ensuring consistent and secure handling of token refunds during cross-chain reverts.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for similar token recovery patterns in other contracts
# Look for contracts that might need similar fixes

# Search for onRevert functions that might need token recovery
ast-grep --pattern 'function onRevert(RevertContext calldata $_) {
  $$$
}'

# Search for potential token transfers in revert scenarios
rg -U "function onRevert.*?\{.*?transfer.*?\}" -A 5

Length of output: 131


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for onRevert functions with a simpler pattern
echo "=== Searching for onRevert functions ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'function onRevert'

echo -e "\n=== Searching for ZRC20 transfer calls ==="
rg "IZRC20.*transfer" -B 2 -A 2

echo -e "\n=== Searching for RevertContext usage ==="
rg "RevertContext" -B 2 -A 2

Length of output: 4034

@fadeev fadeev marked this pull request as draft January 8, 2025 12:31
@fadeev fadeev marked this pull request as ready for review January 8, 2025 12:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Refund unused tokens to the sender on ZetaChain
1 participant