Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

testing PR comment #208

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

testing PR comment #208

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

Greyeye
Copy link
Collaborator

@Greyeye Greyeye commented May 1, 2024

testing pr commenting.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 1, 2024

Temporary image deleted.

@Greyeye
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Greyeye commented May 1, 2024

test

@Greyeye
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Greyeye commented May 1, 2024

test2

@zapier-sre-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Mergecat's Review

Click to read mergecats review!

😼 Mergecat review of cmd/README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+# CMD
+
+testing read me
\ No newline at end of file

Feedback & Suggestions: 📝 It's a good start to include a README file for better documentation. However, consider adding a newline at the end of the file to conform to POSIX standards, which can prevent potential issues with version control systems and command-line tools that expect this newline. Additionally, expanding the content to include more detailed information about the project, usage instructions, or development guidelines could significantly enhance the utility of the README.


😼 Mergecat review of pkg/git/manager.go

@@ -30,15 +30,15 @@ func (rm *RepoManager) Clone(ctx context.Context, cloneUrl, branchName string) (
 	}
 
 	rm.lock.Lock()
-	defer rm.lock.Unlock() // just for safety's sake
+	//defer rm.lock.Unlock() // just for safety's sake
 	rm.repos = append(rm.repos, repo)
 
 	return repo, nil
 }
 
 func (rm *RepoManager) Cleanup() {
 	rm.lock.Lock()
-	defer rm.lock.Unlock()
+	//defer rm.lock.Unlock()
 
 	for _, repo := range rm.repos {
 		repo.Wipe()

🔍 Feedback & Suggestions:

  1. Critical Issue with Mutex Unlocking 🚨: The removal of defer rm.lock.Unlock() in both the Clone and Cleanup methods is highly concerning. This change introduces a significant risk of deadlocks, as the mutex rm.lock is never unlocked if the function exits normally or if any panics occur before reaching an unlock statement. This can lead to the application hanging, especially under high load or concurrent operations.

  2. Recommendation ✅: Revert the changes that comment out the defer rm.lock.Unlock() lines. The use of defer for unlocking right after locking is a common and recommended practice in Go to ensure that locks are always released, regardless of how the function exits (either normally or via an error path).

  3. Potential Improvement 🛠️: If the intention behind commenting out defer rm.lock.Unlock() was to optimize performance by reducing the overhead of defer, consider manually managing lock and unlock, but ensure that every possible path out of the function includes an unlock. This approach is error-prone and generally not recommended unless absolutely necessary for performance.

  4. General Advice 📘: Always ensure that every lock acquired is paired with an unlock on all code paths. Failing to do so can lead to difficult-to-debug issues in production environments.


😼 Mergecat review of pkg/git/repo.go

@@ -20,7 +20,6 @@ import (
 	"github.com/zapier/kubechecks/pkg"
 	"github.com/zapier/kubechecks/pkg/config"
 	"github.com/zapier/kubechecks/pkg/vcs"
-	"github.com/zapier/kubechecks/telemetry"
 )
 
 type Repo struct {
@@ -119,10 +118,10 @@ func (r *Repo) MergeIntoTarget(ctx context.Context, sha string) error {
 	defer span.End()
 
 	cmd := r.execCommand("git", "merge", sha)
-	out, err := cmd.CombinedOutput()
+	_, err := cmd.CombinedOutput()
 	if err != nil {
-		telemetry.SetError(span, err, "merge commit into branch")
-		log.Error().Err(err).Msgf("unable to merge %s, %s", sha, out)
+		//telemetry.SetError(span, err, "merge commit into branch")
+		//log.Error().Err(err).Msgf("unable to merge %s, %s", sha, out)
 		return err
 	}
 

🔍 Feedback & Suggestions:

  1. Removal of Telemetry Package: The removal of the telemetry package import suggests that telemetry features are being deprecated or moved. If telemetry is still needed elsewhere in your application, ensure that its functionality is not compromised by this removal. If this is an intentional deprecation, consider adding comments or documentation to inform other developers.

  2. Error Handling and Logging: The changes in the error handling and logging within the MergeIntoTarget function remove detailed error reporting and logging. This could make debugging more difficult, especially in production environments where detailed logs are crucial for diagnosing issues. Consider the following:

    • If the removal of detailed error logging (log.Error()) and telemetry error setting (telemetry.SetError()) is intentional due to performance or security reasons, it might be beneficial to replace them with a different form of error handling that still provides sufficient context for debugging without compromising performance or security.
    • If the detailed error messages were removed by mistake, restoring them or implementing an alternative detailed logging mechanism would be advisable.
  3. Commented Code: The newly commented-out lines of code (//telemetry.SetError(span, err, "merge commit into branch") and //log.Error().Err(err).Msgf("unable to merge %s, %s", sha, out)) should either be removed if they are no longer needed, or a TODO or FIXME comment should be added to indicate why they are commented out and what the intended future action is.

👉 Overall, ensure that the changes align with the broader goals of error handling, logging, and telemetry in your application. If reducing verbosity or dependencies is the goal, consider alternative methods to maintain functionality without sacrificing observability and debuggability.



Dependency Review

Click to read mergecats review!

No suggestions found

@Greyeye Greyeye closed this Sep 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants