Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better literal delimiter content string slice #736

Merged

Conversation

zickb
Copy link

@zickb zickb commented Aug 29, 2023

Instead of creating a new StringSlice only containing the delimiter chars, use the provided StringSlice from the match method with an appropriate start and end index.

Marked as draft until it is clear if this change is desired.

Fixes: #735

Benni added 4 commits August 30, 2023 00:40
instead of creating a new StringSlice only containing the delimiter chars, use the provided StringSlice from the match method with an appropriate start and end index
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 6018466262

  • 18 of 21 (85.71%) changed or added relevant lines in 3 files are covered.
  • 7 unchanged lines in 1 file lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.03%) to 93.324%

Changes Missing Coverage Covered Lines Changed/Added Lines %
src/Markdig/Syntax/Inlines/EmphasisDelimiterInline.cs 6 9 66.67%
Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
src/Markdig/Syntax/Inlines/EmphasisDelimiterInline.cs 7 45.71%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 5985225602: -0.03%
Covered Lines: 26043
Relevant Lines: 27305

💛 - Coveralls

@xoofx xoofx marked this pull request as ready for review August 30, 2023 05:29
@xoofx xoofx merged commit 7d40bc1 into xoofx:master Aug 30, 2023
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Inconvenient Content StringSlice for emphasis delimiter literal inlines
3 participants