Fix missing claims for federated users for jwt token issuers

[sandushi]

Purpose

• Fix the issue of missing claims for federated users for jwt token issuers.
• To get the tokenID from the access token, we need to pass the jti of the jwt tokens.
• From this PR, the changes are done for the jwt token to extract the jti value and pass it for the getTokenIdByAccessToken to get the token id.

Related issue

wso2/product-is#21387

Checklist (for reviewing)

General

• Is this PR explained thoroughly? All code changes must be accounted for in the PR description.
• Is the PR labeled correctly?

Functionality

• Are all requirements met? Compare implemented functionality with the requirements specification.
• Does the UI work as expected? There should be no Javascript errors in the console; all resources should load. There should be no unexpected errors. Deliberately try to break the feature to find out if there are corner cases that are not handled.

Code

• Do you fully understand the introduced changes to the code? If not ask for clarification, it might uncover ways to solve a problem in a more elegant and efficient way.
• Does the PR introduce any inefficient database requests? Use the debug server to check for duplicate requests.
• Are all necessary strings marked for translation? All strings that are exposed to users via the UI must be marked for translation.

Tests

• Are there sufficient test cases? Ensure that all components are tested individually; models, forms, and serializers should be tested in isolation even if a test for a view covers these components.
• If this is a bug fix, are tests for the issue in place? There must be a test case for the bug to ensure the issue won’t regress. Make sure that the tests break without the new code to fix the issue.
• If this is a new feature or a significant change to an existing feature? has the manual testing spreadsheet been updated with instructions for manual testing?

Security

• Confirm this PR doesn't commit any keys, passwords, tokens, usernames, or other secrets.
• Are all UI and API inputs run through forms or serializers?
• Are all external inputs validated and sanitized appropriately?
• Does all branching logic have a default case?
• Does this solution handle outliers and edge cases gracefully?
• Are all external communications secured and restricted to SSL?

Documentation

• Are changes to the UI documented in the platform docs? If this PR introduces new platform site functionality or changes existing ones, the changes should be documented.
• Are changes to the API documented in the API docs? If this PR introduces new API functionality or changes existing ones, the changes must be documented.
• Are reusable components documented? If this PR introduces components that are relevant to other developers (for instance a mixin for a view or a generic form) they should be documented in the Wiki.

[jenkins-is-staging]

PR builder started
Link: https://github.com/wso2/product-is/actions/runs/11473902946

[jenkins-is-staging]

PR builder completed
Link: https://github.com/wso2/product-is/actions/runs/11473902946
Status: failure

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 71.42857% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 56.23%. Comparing base (1f2b348) to head (e71c26d).
Report is 28 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
.../identity/oauth/cache/AuthorizationGrantCache.java	71.42%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #2604   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     56.23%   56.23%           
+ Complexity     8128     8117   -11     
=========================================
  Files           632      632           
  Lines         46158    46163    +5     
  Branches       7771     7771           
=========================================
+ Hits          25956    25960    +4     
  Misses        16478    16478           
- Partials       3724     3725    +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	38.64% <71.42%> (-0.06%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.