chore: improve logging for backups (WPB-12113)

[yamilmedina]

WPB-12113 [Android] Improve logging for backups

---

PR Submission Checklist for internal contributors

• The PR Title

  • conforms to the style of semantic commits messages¹ supported in Wire's Github Workflow²
  • contains a reference JIRA issue number like SQPIT-764
  • answers the question: If merged, this PR will: ... ³

• The PR Description

  • is free of optional paragraphs and you have filled the relevant parts to the best of your ability

---

What's new in this PR?

Issues

Logging was not being performed for importing backups

Causes (Optional)

Difficulty to troubleshoot problems related to it

Solutions

Implement logging, to add more info about failures.

Testing

Test Coverage (Optional)

• I have added automated test to this contribution

How to Test

Fail to import a backup, you should see more info related to the failure.

---

PR Post Submission Checklist for internal contributors (Optional)

• Wire's Github Workflow has automatically linked the PR to a JIRA issue

---

PR Post Merge Checklist for internal contributors

• If any soft of configuration variable was introduced by this PR, it has been added to the relevant documents and the CI jobs have been updated.

---

References

1. https://sparkbox.com/foundry/semantic_commit_messages
2. https://github.com/wireapp/.github#usage
3. E.g. feat(conversation-list): Sort conversations by most emojis in the title #SQPIT-764.

[github-actions]

Test Results

3 252 tests  ±0   3 145 ✅ ±0   4m 16s ⏱️ +7s
  555 suites ±0     107 💤 ±0 
  555 files   ±0       0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 46080c7. ± Comparison against base commit 85c189c.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[datadog-wireapp]

Datadog Report

Branch report: chore/improv-backup-logging
Commit report: 1df4065
Test service: kalium-jvm

✅ 0 Failed, 3145 Passed, 107 Skipped, 29.7s Total Time

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 83.33333% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 52.58%. Comparing base (85c189c) to head (46080c7).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...alium/logic/feature/backup/RestoreBackupUseCase.kt	71.42%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@                Coverage Diff                 @@
##           release/candidate    #3093   +/-   ##
==================================================
  Coverage              52.57%   52.58%           
==================================================
  Files                   1319     1319           
  Lines                  51475    51483    +8     
  Branches                4778     4778           
==================================================
+ Hits                   27065    27072    +7     
  Misses                 22449    22449           
- Partials                1961     1962    +1     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...um/logic/feature/backup/RestoreWebBackupUseCase.kt	82.60% <100.00%> (+1.07%)	⬆️
...alium/logic/feature/backup/RestoreBackupUseCase.kt	71.92% <71.42%> (+1.02%)	⬆️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 85c189c...46080c7. Read the comment docs.