Add SpotNet v1.1

[elaubsch]

This PR adds SpotNet version 1.1, which adds Airlocalize to the set of spot detection methods used to create consensus annotations.

[rossbar]

I took the liberty of updating the version in the gallery example as well, but otherwise LGTM! All the failing CI was unrelated to this PR and has now been fixed. I tested locally and everything worked as expected.

I'll go ahead and approve - feel free to merge whenever you're ready @elaubsch !

[msschwartz21]

@rossbar I was getting ready to open a PR with a tracking related change and found this old PR which I was going to merge in first. Of course now the actions are failing... Would you mind taking a look?

[rossbar]

Would you mind taking a look?

No problem - the root causes were twofold:

1. Dependency sync issues with the docs deps (specifically nbsphinx) - this will only get worse as we're pinned further and further from "current" (i.e. Python 3.12)
2. Updates to ruff, specifically the addition of checks to always use f-strings. I've ignored these checks for now¹ which should generally be unobjectionable, though if anyone feels strongly about how string formatting is done by all means feel free to modify!

>>> layer_names = ['conv_pw_{}_relu'.format(i for i in block_ids)]  # Doesn't evaluate expression
['conv_pw_<generator object <genexpr> at 0x7c532706f680>_relu']
>>> layer_names = ['conv_pw_%s_relu' % i for i in block_ids]
['conv_pw_0_relu', 'conv_pw_1_relu', 'conv_pw_2_relu']

Footnotes

1. this actually led down an interesting rabbit hole with behavior I was unaware of. It seems like there's a difference in whether generator expressions are evaluated with % formatting vs. f-/.format(!). See codeblock above :) ↩

[rossbar]

I rebased on master to pull in the changes from #719 and all is green, so I'll go ahead and get this in as well. Thanks for looking at it @msschwartz21 !