fix trigger eternal executions #2695
Conversation
p6l-richard
requested review from
perkinsjr,
chronark,
mcstepp and
MichaelUnkey
as code owners
|
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
@p6l-richard is attempting to deploy a commit to the Unkey Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Hey there and thank you for opening this pull request! 👋🏼 We require pull request titles to follow the Conventional Commits specification and it looks like your proposed title needs to be adjusted. Details: |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/billing/src/trigger/glossary/_generate-glossary-entry.ts (1)
Line range hint
8-21: Update file documentation to match implementation stepsThe file documentation lists 6 steps, but the implementation contains 7 steps. Please update the documentation to accurately reflect the current implementation:
* This workflow runs multiple steps sequentially: * 1. Keyword Research * 2. Generate Outline -* 3. Draft Sections & Content Takeaways (in parallel) +* 3. Draft Sections +* 4. Content Takeaways -* 4. Generate SEO Meta Tags -* 5. Generate FAQs -* 6. Create PR +* 5. Generate SEO Meta Tags +* 6. Generate FAQs +* 7. Create PR
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
apps/billing/package.json(2 hunks)apps/billing/src/trigger/glossary/_generate-glossary-entry.ts(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
apps/billing/package.json (1)
26-28: Verify @trigger.dev version updates for breaking changes.
The update from 3.2.1 to 3.3.1 for all @trigger.dev packages appears to be related to fixing the eternal executions issue. However, let's verify the changelog for any breaking changes or migration steps.
✅ Verification successful
Since the GitHub API command didn't work (likely due to sandbox limitations), let's try to verify this by checking the codebase for any migration guides or breaking changes documentation.
Let's check the repository for any changelog or breaking changes documentation related to @trigger.dev packages.
Since we can't find any breaking changes documentation in the repository and the update is a minor version bump (3.2.1 to 3.3.1), which typically indicates backward-compatible changes, I can generate the final response.
@trigger.dev version update appears safe to proceed
The update from 3.2.1 to 3.3.1 is a minor version bump, which by semantic versioning conventions should be backward compatible. The codebase shows consistent usage of @trigger.dev v3 SDK imports and no migration scripts, suggesting this update is safe.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Fetch release notes for version range
gh api repos/triggerdotdev/trigger.dev/releases --jq '.[] | select(.tag_name | startswith("v3.3.")) | {version: .tag_name, body: .body}'
Length of output: 138
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for migration guides or breaking changes documentation
fd -e md -e mdx | xargs rg -i "migration|breaking.?changes|upgrade.?guide" -A 5 -B 5
# Also check package.json files for any peer dependencies that might indicate compatibility
fd package.json | xargs cat
Length of output: 51014
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for trigger.dev changelog or breaking changes documentation
fd -e md -e mdx | xargs rg -i "trigger.?dev.*3\.3\.1|trigger.?dev.*changelog|trigger.?dev.*breaking.?changes" -A 5 -B 5
# Also check for any migration scripts or config changes related to trigger.dev
rg -i "trigger.?dev" -g "!package*.json" -g "!*.lock"
Length of output: 3612
apps/billing/src/trigger/glossary/_generate-glossary-entry.ts (2)
Line range hint 80-129: Overall implementation is solid
The changes effectively address the trigger eternal executions issue while maintaining robust error handling and improving observability through better logging. The sequential execution pattern is consistent throughout the implementation, and type safety is preserved.
98-110: Sequential execution change looks good
The change from parallel to sequential execution of draftSections and contentTakeaways tasks aligns with the PR objective to fix trigger eternal executions. This makes the execution flow more predictable and improves error handling.
However, this change may increase the total execution time. Consider monitoring the performance impact in production.
Let's verify the execution time impact:
| @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ | |||
| "main": "index.js", | |||
| "scripts": { | |||
| "dev": "pnpm dlx trigger.dev@latest dev", | |||
| "trigger:deploy": "pnpm dlx trigger.dev@latest deploy", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Documentation needed for trigger.dev deployment workflow
The new trigger:deploy script is currently undocumented. While the repository contains a trigger.config.ts file and deployment documentation for Next.js apps, there's no specific documentation for the trigger.dev deployment process in the billing app.
- Consider adding deployment instructions in
apps/billing/README.md - Document the purpose and usage of the
trigger:deployscript - Include any prerequisites or environment setup required for trigger.dev deployments
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Consider documenting deployment workflow.
The new deployment script aligns with the PR objective and follows the project's package manager conventions.
Let's check if deployment workflow is documented:
Let me check if there's any documentation in other common locations or related files.
Let me check the trigger.config.ts file to see if it contains any deployment-related documentation or comments.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for deployment documentation in common locations
rg -i "trigger.*deploy" README.md docs/ || echo "No deployment documentation found"
Length of output: 164
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any trigger.dev related documentation or configuration
fd -t f -e md . | xargs rg -i "trigger\.dev|deployment" || echo "No related documentation found"
# Check if there are any trigger.dev config files
fd -t f "trigger\.config\." || echo "No trigger.dev config files found"
# Check package.json files for similar scripts in other apps
fd package.json -t f | xargs rg "trigger:deploy" || echo "No similar scripts found"
Length of output: 732
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check trigger.config.ts content
cat apps/billing/trigger.config.ts
Length of output: 411
What does this PR do?
Fixes # (issue)
Type of change
How should this be tested?
This run has been tested already in Triggers production:
Checklist
Required
pnpm buildpnpm fmtconsole.logsgit pull origin mainAppreciated
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Dependency Updates
@trigger.devfor improved functionality and performance.