-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 529
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(keys/service.ts): enhance error message in KeyService for missing ratelimit #2130
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
1 Skipped Deployment
|
|
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes involve updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Thank you for following the naming conventions for pull request titles! 🙏 |
… to include dynamic key and identity values
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
apps/api/src/routes/v1_keys_verifyKey.error.test.ts (3)
8-53
: LGTM! Well-structured test for the "with identity" scenario.The test suite is well-organized and covers the error case for a missing rate limit when an identity is present. The setup is comprehensive, and the assertions are clear.
Consider adding a test case for a successful verification with an existing rate limit to ensure the error case is specific to missing rate limits.
55-94
: LGTM! Consistent test structure for the "without identity" scenario.The test suite maintains a consistent structure with the previous one, which is excellent for readability and maintainability. It effectively tests the error case for a missing rate limit when no identity is present.
For consistency with the "with identity" suite, consider adding a test case for successful verification with an existing rate limit in this scenario as well.
1-94
: Overall, excellent test coverage for error scenarios in key verification.This new test file provides robust coverage for error handling in the
/v1/keys.verifyKey
endpoint, specifically for missing rate limits. The tests are well-structured, consistent, and use appropriate testing utilities.To further enhance the test suite:
- Consider adding positive test cases for successful key verification with existing rate limits in both scenarios (with and without identity).
- Explore edge cases, such as:
- Verifying a key with multiple rate limits, where some exist and some don't.
- Testing the behavior when the rate limit exists but is associated with a different identity or key.
- If not already present elsewhere, consider adding tests for other potential error scenarios, such as invalid keys or malformed requests.
These additions would provide a more comprehensive test suite, ensuring robust error handling and correct behavior across various scenarios.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- apps/api/src/pkg/keys/service.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/api/src/routes/v1_keys_verifyKey.error.test.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
apps/api/src/pkg/keys/service.ts (3)
29-33
: LGTM! Improved error message handling for MissingRatelimitErrorThe changes to the
MissingRatelimitError
constructor enhance the error reporting capabilities:
- The new
message
parameter allows for more detailed and context-specific error messages.- Renaming
name
toratelimitName
improves clarity about what the parameter represents.These changes align well with the PR objective of enhancing the error message for missing ratelimits.
Line range hint
1-651
: Summary: Successfully enhanced error messaging for missing ratelimitsThis PR effectively achieves its objective of enhancing the error message in KeyService for missing ratelimits. The changes in both the
MissingRatelimitError
class and its usage in theKeyService
class contribute to more informative and context-rich error reporting. These improvements will significantly aid in debugging and troubleshooting issues related to missing ratelimits.Key improvements:
- Updated
MissingRatelimitError
constructor for more flexible error messages.- Detailed error message construction in
KeyService
, including key and identity information when available.Overall, these changes enhance the developer experience and align well with best practices for error handling and reporting.
507-514
: LGTM! Enhanced error message for missing ratelimitsThe new error message construction significantly improves the context provided when a ratelimit is missing:
- It includes the requested ratelimit name and the associated key ID.
- When an identity is present, it adds the identity's ID and externalId to the message.
- If no identity is connected, it explicitly states this fact.
These changes align perfectly with the PR objective and will greatly assist in debugging and troubleshooting.
Minor suggestion: Consider adjusting the indentation of this block to match the surrounding code style for consistency.
Let's verify if this change impacts other parts of the codebase:
Verification successful
Verified: Consistent usage of MissingRatelimitError confirmed
The usage of
MissingRatelimitError
is consistent and localized toapps/api/src/pkg/keys/service.ts
. No further changes are required beyond the suggested indentation adjustment.Minor suggestion: Adjust the indentation of the error message block to match the surrounding code style for consistency.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other occurrences of MissingRatelimitError to ensure consistent usage rg "new MissingRatelimitError" --type tsLength of output: 142
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
/v1/keys.verifyKey
endpoint, validating error handling for rate limits and identity verification.Bug Fixes