Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(keys/service.ts): enhance error message in KeyService for missing ratelimit #2130

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 24, 2024

Conversation

chronark
Copy link
Collaborator

@chronark chronark commented Sep 24, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced error messaging for missing rate limits, providing clearer context in error reports.
    • Introduced unit tests for the /v1/keys.verifyKey endpoint, validating error handling for rate limits and identity verification.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved clarity and specificity of error messages when a requested rate limit is not found.

@chronark chronark requested a review from perkinsjr as a code owner September 24, 2024 13:49
Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 24, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
dashboard ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Sep 24, 2024 1:54pm
play ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Sep 24, 2024 1:54pm
workflows ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Sep 24, 2024 1:54pm
www ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Sep 24, 2024 1:54pm
1 Skipped Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
planetfall ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Sep 24, 2024 1:54pm

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Sep 24, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: d544c53

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 24, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes involve updates to the MissingRatelimitError class and its integration within the KeyService class, enhancing error messaging related to missing rate limits. Additionally, a new test file for the /v1/keys.verifyKey endpoint has been introduced, focusing on error handling for scenarios with and without associated identities when verifying keys against rate limits.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
apps/api/src/pkg/keys/service.ts Updated MissingRatelimitError constructor to accept ratelimitName and message. Enhanced error messages in KeyService for missing rate limits.
apps/api/src/routes/v1_keys_verifyKey.error.test.ts Added unit tests for /v1/keys.verifyKey endpoint to verify error handling with and without identities regarding rate limits.

Possibly related PRs

  • fix: default ratelimits #2103: The changes in the KeyService class regarding rate limit handling are directly related to the modifications made to the MissingRatelimitError class, as both involve the management and reporting of rate limits in the API.

Suggested reviewers

  • perkinsjr

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 24, 2024

Thank you for following the naming conventions for pull request titles! 🙏

@chronark chronark enabled auto-merge September 24, 2024 13:49
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
apps/api/src/routes/v1_keys_verifyKey.error.test.ts (3)

8-53: LGTM! Well-structured test for the "with identity" scenario.

The test suite is well-organized and covers the error case for a missing rate limit when an identity is present. The setup is comprehensive, and the assertions are clear.

Consider adding a test case for a successful verification with an existing rate limit to ensure the error case is specific to missing rate limits.


55-94: LGTM! Consistent test structure for the "without identity" scenario.

The test suite maintains a consistent structure with the previous one, which is excellent for readability and maintainability. It effectively tests the error case for a missing rate limit when no identity is present.

For consistency with the "with identity" suite, consider adding a test case for successful verification with an existing rate limit in this scenario as well.


1-94: Overall, excellent test coverage for error scenarios in key verification.

This new test file provides robust coverage for error handling in the /v1/keys.verifyKey endpoint, specifically for missing rate limits. The tests are well-structured, consistent, and use appropriate testing utilities.

To further enhance the test suite:

  1. Consider adding positive test cases for successful key verification with existing rate limits in both scenarios (with and without identity).
  2. Explore edge cases, such as:
    • Verifying a key with multiple rate limits, where some exist and some don't.
    • Testing the behavior when the rate limit exists but is associated with a different identity or key.
  3. If not already present elsewhere, consider adding tests for other potential error scenarios, such as invalid keys or malformed requests.

These additions would provide a more comprehensive test suite, ensuring robust error handling and correct behavior across various scenarios.

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 88bd752 and d544c53.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/api/src/pkg/keys/service.ts (2 hunks)
  • apps/api/src/routes/v1_keys_verifyKey.error.test.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
apps/api/src/pkg/keys/service.ts (3)

29-33: LGTM! Improved error message handling for MissingRatelimitError

The changes to the MissingRatelimitError constructor enhance the error reporting capabilities:

  1. The new message parameter allows for more detailed and context-specific error messages.
  2. Renaming name to ratelimitName improves clarity about what the parameter represents.

These changes align well with the PR objective of enhancing the error message for missing ratelimits.


Line range hint 1-651: Summary: Successfully enhanced error messaging for missing ratelimits

This PR effectively achieves its objective of enhancing the error message in KeyService for missing ratelimits. The changes in both the MissingRatelimitError class and its usage in the KeyService class contribute to more informative and context-rich error reporting. These improvements will significantly aid in debugging and troubleshooting issues related to missing ratelimits.

Key improvements:

  1. Updated MissingRatelimitError constructor for more flexible error messages.
  2. Detailed error message construction in KeyService, including key and identity information when available.

Overall, these changes enhance the developer experience and align well with best practices for error handling and reporting.


507-514: LGTM! Enhanced error message for missing ratelimits

The new error message construction significantly improves the context provided when a ratelimit is missing:

  1. It includes the requested ratelimit name and the associated key ID.
  2. When an identity is present, it adds the identity's ID and externalId to the message.
  3. If no identity is connected, it explicitly states this fact.

These changes align perfectly with the PR objective and will greatly assist in debugging and troubleshooting.

Minor suggestion: Consider adjusting the indentation of this block to match the surrounding code style for consistency.

Let's verify if this change impacts other parts of the codebase:

Verification successful

Verified: Consistent usage of MissingRatelimitError confirmed

The usage of MissingRatelimitError is consistent and localized to apps/api/src/pkg/keys/service.ts. No further changes are required beyond the suggested indentation adjustment.

Minor suggestion: Adjust the indentation of the error message block to match the surrounding code style for consistency.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other occurrences of MissingRatelimitError to ensure consistent usage
rg "new MissingRatelimitError" --type ts

Length of output: 142

@chronark chronark disabled auto-merge September 24, 2024 16:02
@chronark chronark merged commit 1801cd4 into main Sep 24, 2024
27 checks passed
@chronark chronark deleted the ratelimit-error-messages branch September 24, 2024 16:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants