-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Revert RDF list reference-consolidation and test for alignment
This patch undoes an engineering convenience put in place as part of UCO CP-100. RDF Lists that were part of semi-open vocabularies were given IRIs, so they could be referenced for OWL datatype definitions and for SHACL membership testing. This was acknowledged as an incompatibility with OWL 2 DL, which requires that RDF Lists be identified as blank nodes. The concepts were intended to remain until an OWL test mechanism would identify this error. A test mechanism is now under development as part of UCO Issue 406, and correctly flags IRI-identified RDF lists. Hence, this patch undoes the change. To ensure the RDF lists are kept in sync. across their duplicate locations, a Python unit test has been added to confirm list-equality. References: * [UCO OC-12] (CP-100) UCO's idea of "Open vocabulary" does not agree with its implementation with owl:oneOf * #406 Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <[email protected]>
- Loading branch information
1 parent
eba573d
commit e77020d
Showing
5 changed files
with
360 additions
and
141 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.