Update to tokio-tungstenite-0.18.0 and use sha1 #1598
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
arusahni
added a commit
to MaterializeInc/materialize
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2023
Now that tokio-rs/axum#1598 has been included in a release, we can resume tracking the official releases.
4 tasks
arusahni
added a commit
to MaterializeInc/materialize
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2023
Now that tokio-rs/axum#1598 has been included in a release, we can resume tracking the official releases.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Updates to tokio-tungstenite 0.18.0.
This updates tungstenite version to 0.18.0 as dependency.
https://github.com/snapview/tokio-tungstenite/blob/v0.18.0/CHANGELOG.md#0180
This version of tungstenite uses sha1 instead of sha-1 because sha1 is transferred to https://github.com/RustCrypto (RustCrypto/hashes#350) who owned sha-1 so it may be good to use sha1 in this change to avoid duplication.