Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes #37942 - Updating Job Template Documentation with Ansible Check Mode Option #3391

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bnerickson
Copy link

What changes are you introducing?

This PR adds a line of documentation explaining a new Enable Ansible Check Mode option within Ansible Job Templates describing its basic functionality.

Why are you introducing these changes? (Explanation, links to references, issues, etc.)

This documentation explains the new functionality introduced in the following PRs:

Anything else to add? (Considerations, potential downsides, alternative solutions you have explored, etc.)

This PR is dependent on the following PRs being approved/merged first:

Checklists

  • I am okay with my commits getting squashed when you merge this PR.
  • I am familiar with the contributing guidelines.

Please cherry-pick my commits into:

  • Foreman 3.12/Katello 4.14 (Satellite 6.16)
  • Foreman 3.11/Katello 4.13
  • Foreman 3.10/Katello 4.12
  • Foreman 3.9/Katello 4.11 (Satellite 6.15; orcharhino 6.8/6.9/6.10)
  • Foreman 3.8/Katello 4.10
  • Foreman 3.7/Katello 4.9 (Satellite 6.14)
  • Foreman 3.6/Katello 4.8
  • Foreman 3.5/Katello 4.7 (Satellite 6.13; orcharhino 6.6/6.7)
  • We do not accept PRs for Foreman older than 3.5.

@maximiliankolb maximiliankolb added the Waiting for code Requires merge of related code in another repository before it can be merged label Oct 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Not yet reviewed Waiting for code Requires merge of related code in another repository before it can be merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants