Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bump version for local-dev-cluster to 0.0.3 #63

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 16, 2023

Conversation

SamYuan1990
Copy link
Contributor

  • remove kubectl as GHA has kubectl
  • bump to local dev cluster 0.0.3
  • if there is cluster provider then ... use it avoid double running branch define.

@SamYuan1990 SamYuan1990 marked this pull request as ready for review August 1, 2023 13:51
index.js Outdated
parameterExport = parameterExport + "export KIND_VERSION="+kind_version;
parameterExport = parameterExport + " && "
}
}
parameterExport = parameterExport + "export CLUSTER_PROVIDER="+cluster_provider;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need to have check if (parameterExport != ""). We are already assigning it value here. In any case it will not be empty

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In that case, also it will not make parameterExport empty. In the setup function, we are providing cluster_provider so when it comes to line 42 we are setting the value of parameterExport anyways. Why do we need checks at line 48, 58 and 68 ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

aha, I got your point.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@vprashar2929 I just update this PR with a fix. :-) please help review.

Copy link
Contributor

@vprashar2929 vprashar2929 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@SamYuan1990
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rootfs , could you please help merge this PR?

@rootfs rootfs merged commit 6fe59d2 into sustainable-computing-io:main Aug 16, 2023
10 checks passed
@vprashar2929
Copy link
Contributor

@SamYuan1990 Are we good to create a release as this PR is merged?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants