chore!: 1:1 between MR and infra for ID fields

[tenstad]

Should these be ...Id as that is the conect of the infra resource?

Open for closing this, just wanna raise the question.

[tenstad]

Hmmm, seems the convention is actually Id on all fields, at least according to https://github.com/crossplane/crossplane/blob/5ce2f115f2653e29fb9b1cf501439403bda5c675/design/one-pager-cross-resource-referencing.md?plain=1#L176 and https://github.com/crossplane/crossplane issue 707

So it's not a ref to the Kind, but a technical ref to the actual field, weird 🤔

Wouldn't it be more intuitive to reference the managed resource, and use the name of the Kind. Especially as the ref has a name. Having userIdRef, the name is not for the userId, but for the User (kind).