-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 149
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
1.0.0-alpha1 #847
1.0.0-alpha1 #847
Conversation
Includes fixes to comments by @ricardozanini Signed-off-by: Charles d'Avernas <[email protected]>
This is a rebase of previous PR, which had gone critically wrong with signoffs. |
Signed-off-by: Charles d'Avernas <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Charles d'Avernas <[email protected]>
…iting` Signed-off-by: Charles d'Avernas <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Charles d'Avernas <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we should move on and handle the minors in another PR.
@cdavernas do you agree that we need to convert the examples into the new DSL and keep them here?
If so, we can open a new issue and do so.
@ricardozanini Not necessarilly, as they are given by the features. Those might be difficult to find for newcomers, though, intimidated by ctk, features, ... But if you feel we should, then I'll get going before merging this one. |
@cdavernas I can send a PR on top of yours to fix the examples if you want, but tomorrow. Today my day is packed already :D |
- Updated/fixed the dsl-reference.md file - Ordered maintainers and code owners by alphabetic order - Deleted the obsolete specification.md file Signed-off-by: Charles d'Avernas <[email protected]>
…untime expression language and mode. Partially addresses serverlessworkflow#848 Signed-off-by: Charles d'Avernas <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Charles d'Avernas <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Charles d'Avernas <[email protected]>
@ricardozanini I added the first example, to boostrap the PR you spoke about. In the mean time, should I merge? |
…ference and schema Signed-off-by: Charles d'Avernas <[email protected]>
@cdavernas sure, let's merge if you have the fup issues to handle the pending tasks we have. 👍 |
Closes #843 |
Many thanks for submitting your Pull Request ❤️!
Please specify parts of this PR update:
Discussion or Issue link:
#843
What this PR does / why we need it:
The version
1.0.0-alpha1
is one of the most impacting release of the history of the Serverless Workflow DSL. It aims at both drastically simplify the DSL and at completing it with many new features.It is intended to be the last release containing breaking changes before the Serverless Workflow DSL
1.0.0
can see the day.What's new?
Addresses Rename data filter properties #672.
namespace
DNS Label property.Addresses Add namespace property #838.
Addresses Use maps instead of arrays for complex objects in the specification #831.
Partially addresses Refactor external references #691.
state
andaction
concepts intotask
, getting rid of state nesting limitations. See tasks.end
andtransition
into flow directives.Addresses Group
End
andTransition
properties #684.Addresses Backward Compatibility: Parallel Branch does not support direct use of states definitions #413.
Addresses Rename action
functionRef
property #828.Addresses Add multi retryRef to action #681 and Refactor retries #772.
Addresses Add means to throw an error #771.
Addresses Add stand-alone example resources #324.
Addresses Rename eventDef correlation properties #679 and Find a way to name processed correlation keys #680.