Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 5 pull requests #128966

Closed
wants to merge 13 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

ChrisDenton and others added 13 commits August 9, 2024 10:43
Refactor `powerpc64` call ABI handling

As the [specification](https://openpowerfoundation.org/specifications/64bitelfabi/) for the ELFv2 ABI states that returned aggregates are returned like arguments as long as they are at most two doublewords, I've merged the `classify_arg` and `classify_ret` functions to reduce code duplication. The only functional change is to fix rust-lang#128579: the `classify_ret` function was incorrectly handling aggregates where `bits > 64 && bits < 128`. I've used the aggregate handling implementation from `classify_arg` which doesn't have this issue.

`@awilfox` could you test this on `powerpc64-unknown-linux-musl`? I'm only able to cross-test on `powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu` and `powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu` locally at the moment, and as a tier 3 target `powerpc64-unknown-linux-musl` has zero CI coverage.

Fixes: rust-lang#128579
…k-Simulacrum

Add windows-targets crate to std's sysroot

With this PR, when backtrace is used as a crate from crates.io it will (once updated) use the real [windows-targets](https://crates.io/crates/windows-targets) crate. But when used from std it'll use std's replacement version.

This allows sharing our customized `windows_tagets::link!` macro between std proper and the backtrace crate when used as part of std, ensuring a consistent linking story. This will be especially important once we move to using [`raw-dylib`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/items/external-blocks.html#dylib-versus-raw-dylib) by default.
…iler-errors

Tidy up `dump-ice-to-disk` and make assertion failures dump ICE messages

For the future traveler: **if you did a `git blame` and found this PR that last modified `dump-ice-to-disk` because the test failed in a completely unrelated PR, then I'm afraid our ICE dump may have regressed or somehow behaves differently on `i686-mingw`.**

A bit of clean up to the `dump-ice-to-disk` test.

- Fixes/updates the top-level comment.
- Add a FIXME pointing to rust-lang#128911 for flakiness.
- Instead of trying to manually cleanup `rustc-ice*.txt` dumps, run each test instance in a separate temp directory.
- Explicitly make `RUSTC_ICE` unavailable in one of the `-Zmetrics-dir` test case to not have interference from environment.
- Make assertion failures (on ICE dump line count mismatch) extremely verbose to help debug why this test is flakey in CI (rust-lang#128911).

Contains a fix by `@saethlin` in rust-lang#128909, should wait until that is merged then rebase on top.

try-job: aarch64-gnu
try-job: aarch64-apple
try-job: x86_64-msvc
try-job: i686-mingw
try-job: test-various
…s, r=compiler-errors

Fix codegen-units tests that were disabled 8 years ago

I don't know if any of these tests still have value. They were disabled by rust-lang#33890, and we've survived without them for a while. But considering how small this test suite is, maybe it's worth having them.

I also had to add some normalization to the codegen-units tests output. I think the fact that I had to add some underscores how poor our test coverage is.
Fix warnings in rmake tests on `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu`

r? `@jieyouxu`

This PR fixes some warnings I saw in rmake tests. I didn't deny more warnings in this PR until `@jieyouxu` gives their opinion, but maybe we should actually deny all warnings in `rmake.rs` files?

I've also only looked at non-ignored tests on `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu`, and denying warnings would require a try build for all targets 😓.
@rustbot rustbot added A-run-make Area: port run-make Makefiles to rmake.rs A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc O-windows Operating system: Windows S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Aug 11, 2024
@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member Author

Note that this rollup also contains an attempt to make a flakey test more obvious as to why it fails.
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 11, 2024

📌 Commit ec6618b has been approved by jieyouxu

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 11, 2024
@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r- (I'm going to disable the flakey test on Windows to not block full CIs)

@jieyouxu jieyouxu closed this Aug 11, 2024
@jieyouxu jieyouxu deleted the rollup-cqf0zxy branch August 11, 2024 11:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-run-make Area: port run-make Makefiles to rmake.rs A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc O-windows Operating system: Windows rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants