-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 90
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Restore dashing/eloquent behaviour of "service_is_available" #190
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Erik Boasson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Erik Boasson <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
@hidmic friendly ping |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ivanpauno agreed.
Have you investigated the failing test? I guess it's something that we don't normally test for, since it would typically run with |
@jacobperron it's a |
@hidmic I meant the jobs from ci.ros2.org: https://ci.ros2.org/job/ci_linux/10939/testReport/junit/(root)/rclcpp/test_subscription_topic_statistics_gtest_missing_result/ |
I see. I have not. I'll check locally. |
It's happening in Seems unrelated to me |
Indeed. Fix incoming. In the meantime, let's merge. |
This "mostly fixes" the lost service responses (#183, #74) by reinstating the check for a matching reader and writer in
rmw_service_server_is_available
that was accidentally deleted when the 1:1 mapping of nodes to participants was replaced by a 1:1 mapping of contexts to participants. This effectively restores dashing/eloquent behaviour.It doesn't truly fix the problem and in the presence of packet loss the likelihood of failure remains significant. However, the workaround proposed in #187 is a bit controversial and this restoration of the old code at least should be non-controversial.