-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 127
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add rosout logging to rclrs #422
Open
geoff-imdex
wants to merge
5
commits into
ros2-rust:main
Choose a base branch
from
geoff-imdex:main
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+431
−22
Open
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
239dab3
Initial logging implementation
geoff-imdex 6ad25da
* Moved logging_fini to follow correct call sequence based on rclcpp
geoff-imdex d5a6bc4
Primary change to fix builder's node variable going out of scope
geoff-imdex 19e8d3d
Merge branch 'ros2-rust:main' into main
geoff-imdex 673d478
Fix linting issue with use statement
geoff-imdex File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This will get called every time a Context is created, but it's meant to be called only once. It's possible for users to create multiple Contexts in one application (we do this a lot in tests), so we'd be making redundant calls.
Similar to ros2/rclcpp#998 we should guard this from being called multiple times. We also need to make sure that
rcl_logging_fini
is only called after all Contexts are destructed.This is a tricky problem to resolve in a sound way. I might suggest something like this:
Then we would add an
Arc<LoggingLifecycle>
to theContextHandle
. Once allContextHandle
s are gone, theLoggingLifecycle
will drop and callrcl_logging_fini
. If a new context is made after that,rcl_logging_configure
will be called again.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Really good pick-up and suggestion @mxgrey - thank you. Will update the code to make use of your suggestion.