Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(ci): update CI to current standards, remove outdated ci, add new testing #108

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 2, 2024

Conversation

MSevey
Copy link
Contributor

@MSevey MSevey commented Jul 2, 2024

Overview

Updates the CI to match our standard rollkit CI:

  • Removes outdated testing CI
  • Adds new testing with docker compose
  • Adds housekeeping flow
  • Other updates

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced automatic code review assignment configuration.
    • Added a pull request template with guidelines for contributors.
    • Implemented a workflow for managing GitHub issues and pull requests.
    • Added a workflow for Semantic Pull Requests.
  • Chores

    • Introduced a workflow for running tests using Docker Compose.
    • Added container_name for services in compose.yaml.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 2, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@MSevey has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 21 minutes and 54 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 60cc1dc and 4bcdc9d.

Walkthrough

The introduced changes enhance the automation and workflow management of the GitHub repository. This includes automatic assignment of code reviews, addition of a pull request template, and workflows for issue triaging, semantic pull request validation, and automated testing using Docker. These updates improve code quality checks, streamline PR reviews, and standardize contributions, while Docker configurations make local development and testing more manageable.

Changes

Files/Groups Change Summaries
.github/auto_request_review.yml Adds settings for automatic assignment of code reviewers based on file changes and specific configurations.
.github/pull_request_template.md Provides a template to help contributors properly format and explain their pull requests.
.github/workflows/housekeeping.yml Introduces a workflow for managing issues and pull requests, including auto-assigning and tagging.
.github/workflows/semantic-pull-request.yml Sets up a workflow to enforce semantic commit messages in pull requests for better changelog management.
.github/workflows/test.yml Adds a workflow named "Test" to run test containers using Docker Compose on code pushes and pull requests.
compose.yaml Adds container_name properties to gm and local-da services for better readability and management.

Poem

In the meadow where codes align,
Reviewers gather, a digital sign.
Templates guide the humble quest,
Ensuring each commit is the best.
Dockers hum in a rhythmic tone,
Keeping our projects neat and known.
🐇🌸


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@MSevey MSevey marked this pull request as draft July 2, 2024 13:38
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/auto_request_review.yml (1)

[!TIP]
Codebase Verification

Permissions for auto-assigning issues and PRs are missing.

The .github/auto_request_review.yml file does not contain the required permissions settings. Ensure that the job includes issues: write and pull-requests: write permissions to function correctly.

  • .github/auto_request_review.yml (missing permissions settings)
Analysis chain

Line range hint 48-66: Ensure proper permissions for auto-assigning issues and PRs.

The job requires issues: write and pull-requests: write permissions. Verify that these permissions are correctly set and handled.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the permissions required by the auto-assign job.

# Test: Check the job steps for proper permission handling.
gh api repos/rollkit/gm/contents/.github/workflows/housekeeping.yml | jq -r '.content' | base64 --decode | grep permissions

Length of output: 222



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the permissions required by the auto-assign job.

# Test: Check the job steps for proper permission handling.
gh api repos/rollkit/gm/contents/.github/auto_request_review.yml | jq -r '.content' | grep permissions

Length of output: 127



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Locate the .yml files in the .github directory and check for permissions.

# Step 1: Find all .yml files in the .github directory.
yml_files=$(fd --extension yml --search-path .github)

# Step 2: Check each file for the permissions keyword.
for file in $yml_files; do
  echo "Checking file: $file"
  grep permissions "$file"
done

Length of output: 1469

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2795413 and 60cc1dc.

Files selected for processing (6)
  • .github/auto_request_review.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/pull_request_template.md (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/housekeeping.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/semantic-pull-request.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
  • compose.yaml (2 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to errors (1)
  • .github/workflows/housekeeping.yml (no review received)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
  • .github/pull_request_template.md
  • .github/workflows/semantic-pull-request.yml
  • .github/workflows/test.yml
  • compose.yaml
Additional comments not posted (3)
.github/auto_request_review.yml (3)

Line range hint 24-36: Ensure proper permissions for adding PRs to the project.

The job uses a reusable workflow and requires issues: write and pull-requests: write permissions. Verify that the reusable workflow handles these permissions correctly.


Line range hint 37-47: Ensure proper permissions for auto-adding reviewers.

The job uses a reusable workflow and requires issues: write and pull-requests: write permissions. Verify that the reusable workflow handles these permissions correctly.


Line range hint 10-23: Ensure proper permissions for issue management.

The job uses a reusable workflow and requires issues: write and pull-requests: write permissions. Verify that the reusable workflow handles these permissions correctly.

Verification successful

Permissions are correctly set in the housekeeping.yml file.

The issue-management job in .github/workflows/housekeeping.yml includes the necessary issues: write and pull-requests: write permissions.

  • .github/workflows/housekeeping.yml:
    jobs:
      issue-management:
        permissions:
          issues: write
          pull-requests: write
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the permissions required by the reusable workflow.

# Test: Check the reusable workflow for proper permission handling.
gh api repos/rollkit/.github/contents/.github/workflows/reusable_housekeeping.yml | jq -r '.content' | base64 --decode | grep permissions

Length of output: 211



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the permissions required by the reusable workflow.

# Test: Check the reusable workflow for proper permission handling.
gh api repos/rollkit/.github/contents/.github/workflows/reusable_housekeeping.yml | jq -r '.content' | grep permissions

Length of output: 119



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Fetch the entire content of the reusable workflow for manual inspection.

# Fetch and decode the content of the reusable workflow
gh api repos/rollkit/.github/contents/.github/workflows/reusable_housekeeping.yml | jq -r '.content' | base64 -d

Length of output: 186



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Fetch the entire content of the reusable workflow for manual inspection.

# Fetch the raw content of the reusable workflow
gh api repos/rollkit/contents/.github/workflows/reusable_housekeeping.yml | jq -r '.download_url' | xargs curl -s

Length of output: 138



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Locate the reusable workflow file and fetch its content for manual inspection.

# Locate the reusable workflow file
fd reusable_housekeeping.yml

# Fetch the content of the reusable workflow file
cat $(fd reusable_housekeeping.yml)

Length of output: 68



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: List all YAML files in the .github/workflows directory and inspect their contents.

# List all YAML files in the .github/workflows directory
fd .yml .github/workflows

# Display the contents of each YAML file for inspection
for file in $(fd .yml .github/workflows); do
  echo "Contents of $file:"
  cat $file
  echo
done

Length of output: 4526

.github/auto_request_review.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
@MSevey MSevey marked this pull request as ready for review July 2, 2024 14:58
@MSevey MSevey enabled auto-merge (squash) July 2, 2024 14:58
@MSevey MSevey merged commit a05f2c6 into main Jul 2, 2024
7 checks passed
@MSevey MSevey deleted the ci-updates branch July 2, 2024 15:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants