-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(ci): update CI to current standards, remove outdated ci, add new testing #108
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@MSevey has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 21 minutes and 54 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe introduced changes enhance the automation and workflow management of the GitHub repository. This includes automatic assignment of code reviews, addition of a pull request template, and workflows for issue triaging, semantic pull request validation, and automated testing using Docker. These updates improve code quality checks, streamline PR reviews, and standardize contributions, while Docker configurations make local development and testing more manageable. Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/auto_request_review.yml (1)
[!TIP]
Codebase VerificationPermissions for auto-assigning issues and PRs are missing.
The
.github/auto_request_review.yml
file does not contain the requiredpermissions
settings. Ensure that the job includesissues: write
andpull-requests: write
permissions to function correctly.
.github/auto_request_review.yml
(missingpermissions
settings)Analysis chain
Line range hint
48-66
: Ensure proper permissions for auto-assigning issues and PRs.The job requires
issues: write
andpull-requests: write
permissions. Verify that these permissions are correctly set and handled.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the permissions required by the auto-assign job. # Test: Check the job steps for proper permission handling. gh api repos/rollkit/gm/contents/.github/workflows/housekeeping.yml | jq -r '.content' | base64 --decode | grep permissionsLength of output: 222
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the permissions required by the auto-assign job. # Test: Check the job steps for proper permission handling. gh api repos/rollkit/gm/contents/.github/auto_request_review.yml | jq -r '.content' | grep permissionsLength of output: 127
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate the .yml files in the .github directory and check for permissions. # Step 1: Find all .yml files in the .github directory. yml_files=$(fd --extension yml --search-path .github) # Step 2: Check each file for the permissions keyword. for file in $yml_files; do echo "Checking file: $file" grep permissions "$file" doneLength of output: 1469
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- .github/auto_request_review.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/pull_request_template.md (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/housekeeping.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/semantic-pull-request.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
- compose.yaml (2 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to errors (1)
- .github/workflows/housekeeping.yml (no review received)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- .github/pull_request_template.md
- .github/workflows/semantic-pull-request.yml
- .github/workflows/test.yml
- compose.yaml
Additional comments not posted (3)
.github/auto_request_review.yml (3)
Line range hint
24-36
: Ensure proper permissions for adding PRs to the project.The job uses a reusable workflow and requires
issues: write
andpull-requests: write
permissions. Verify that the reusable workflow handles these permissions correctly.
Line range hint
37-47
: Ensure proper permissions for auto-adding reviewers.The job uses a reusable workflow and requires
issues: write
andpull-requests: write
permissions. Verify that the reusable workflow handles these permissions correctly.
Line range hint
10-23
: Ensure proper permissions for issue management.The job uses a reusable workflow and requires
issues: write
andpull-requests: write
permissions. Verify that the reusable workflow handles these permissions correctly.Verification successful
Permissions are correctly set in the
housekeeping.yml
file.The
issue-management
job in.github/workflows/housekeeping.yml
includes the necessaryissues: write
andpull-requests: write
permissions.
.github/workflows/housekeeping.yml
:jobs: issue-management: permissions: issues: write pull-requests: writeScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the permissions required by the reusable workflow. # Test: Check the reusable workflow for proper permission handling. gh api repos/rollkit/.github/contents/.github/workflows/reusable_housekeeping.yml | jq -r '.content' | base64 --decode | grep permissionsLength of output: 211
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the permissions required by the reusable workflow. # Test: Check the reusable workflow for proper permission handling. gh api repos/rollkit/.github/contents/.github/workflows/reusable_housekeeping.yml | jq -r '.content' | grep permissionsLength of output: 119
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Fetch the entire content of the reusable workflow for manual inspection. # Fetch and decode the content of the reusable workflow gh api repos/rollkit/.github/contents/.github/workflows/reusable_housekeeping.yml | jq -r '.content' | base64 -dLength of output: 186
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Fetch the entire content of the reusable workflow for manual inspection. # Fetch the raw content of the reusable workflow gh api repos/rollkit/contents/.github/workflows/reusable_housekeeping.yml | jq -r '.download_url' | xargs curl -sLength of output: 138
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate the reusable workflow file and fetch its content for manual inspection. # Locate the reusable workflow file fd reusable_housekeeping.yml # Fetch the content of the reusable workflow file cat $(fd reusable_housekeeping.yml)Length of output: 68
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: List all YAML files in the .github/workflows directory and inspect their contents. # List all YAML files in the .github/workflows directory fd .yml .github/workflows # Display the contents of each YAML file for inspection for file in $(fd .yml .github/workflows); do echo "Contents of $file:" cat $file echo doneLength of output: 4526
Overview
Updates the CI to match our standard rollkit CI:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores
container_name
for services incompose.yaml
.