Use MuJoCo Menagerie model for gen3_mj_description

[kevinzakka]

No description provided.

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9714466205

Details

• 6 of 6 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage increased (+0.02%) to 97.54%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 9694182113:	0.02%
Covered Lines:	912
Relevant Lines:	935

---

💛 - Coveralls

[stephane-caron]

Can you confirm this description is a better fit for MuJoCo than kinova_mj_description? If so, we could update gen3_mj_description to avoid a duplicate.

On a side note, currently we don't include robot maker names in description identifiers, just robot names (from CONTRIBUTING.md: "The file name for the new submodule is <robot_name>_description.py in snake-case."). It has not happened yet that different makes use the same robot name 😅

[kevinzakka]

Hi @stephane-caron, apologies for the delayed response. I can confirm that the Menagerie model is a better fit for a few reasons. Main one is that it is actively being used and maintained by collaborators at Stanford.

[kevinzakka]

FYI, there is no "gen3 jaco" model, jaco was the previous iteration. Should be updated for the non MuJoCo models as well.

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 10044955281

Details

• 2 of 2 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage remained the same at 97.524%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 10044927097:	0.0%
Covered Lines:	906
Relevant Lines:	929

---

💛 - Coveralls