Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Compliance command failure #452

Open
T0288827 opened this issue Apr 10, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Compliance command failure #452

T0288827 opened this issue Apr 10, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@T0288827
Copy link

I am trying to run compliance test for the Pico core using my UVM ENV but facing issue while running compliance command
with reference to attached file.
Compliance Testing Failure using the below command as follow.docx

Please let me know if any switch is missed to add in my compliance command.

@MarcKarasek
Copy link
Collaborator

MarcKarasek commented Apr 10, 2024 via email

@allenjbaum
Copy link
Collaborator

Did you try this fix?
IF yes, did this fix your problem?
IF yes, please close this issue
IF no, please describe what errors you get when following Marc's advice
If no description is following, I'd advise the maintainer is to close this proactively in a couple of weeks.

@T0288827
Copy link
Author

Thanks for the reply,but for my project Riscof is not the usage. Can you let me know is there any infrastructure to handle the test.S
Because I could see CVA6 and few more IPs are running without Riscof platform.

@allenjbaum
Copy link
Collaborator

Sorry, but the arch-test sigs use the arch-test framework, which is riscof.
IF you don't use riscof, these tests won't help at all (since they are not self checking, and require running Sail and comparing the results)

There are also a set of spike tests that might be more appropriate for your use case:
https://github.com/riscv-software-src/riscv-tests
Caveat: they only support the configurations that Spike supports, and they don't have a lot of coverage.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants