-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(tests): ensure consistent order of ResourceDefinition in tests #64
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Poem
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
cerbos/generator/builder_test.go (1)
180-185
: LGTM with suggestions for improvementThe sorting implementation successfully addresses the non-deterministic test behavior. However, consider these improvements:
- Extract the sorting logic into a helper function to avoid duplication
- Consider sorting Actions within each ResourceDefinition for complete determinism
Here's a suggested refactor:
+func sortResourceDefinitions(defs []ResourceDefinition) { + sort.Slice(defs, func(i, j int) bool { + return defs[i].Resource < defs[j].Resource + }) + // Sort actions within each definition for complete determinism + for i := range defs { + sort.Slice(defs[i].Actions, func(x, y int) bool { + return defs[i].Actions[x].Action < defs[i].Actions[y].Action + }) + } +} func TestResourceBuilder_Build(t *testing.T) { // ... existing code ... result := builder.Build() - sort.Slice(result, func(i, j int) bool { - return result[i].Resource < result[j].Resource - }) - sort.Slice(tt.expected, func(i, j int) bool { - return tt.expected[i].Resource < tt.expected[j].Resource - }) + sortResourceDefinitions(result) + sortResourceDefinitions(tt.expected) assert.Equal(t, tt.expected, result)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
cerbos/generator/builder_test.go
(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
cerbos/generator/builder_test.go (1)
4-4
: LGTM: Import addition is appropriate
The sort package import is correctly placed and necessary for the new sorting functionality.
Summary by CodeRabbit