Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add javadoc to clear up implicit behavior #3991

Merged

Conversation

joshrotenberg
Copy link
Contributor

This should probably be fixed with some kind of configuration merging, but in an effort to avoid breaking changes, these docs should at least make the behavior clear.

Fixes #3982.

Copy link
Collaborator

@sazzad16 sazzad16 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@joshrotenberg Thank you for this PR. Suggested some changes, please address. You can your own words in sentences.

src/main/java/redis/clients/jedis/Jedis.java Show resolved Hide resolved
src/main/java/redis/clients/jedis/Jedis.java Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/main/java/redis/clients/jedis/UnifiedJedis.java Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@joshrotenberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

I made a few changes, let me know what you think.

@sazzad16 sazzad16 merged commit bea79a9 into redis:master Oct 13, 2024
4 of 5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Constructors that accept a URI and a JedisClientConfig pull elements from both without documentation
2 participants