-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 533
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Delete operators/hazelcast-platform-operator #4638
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Delete operators/hazelcast-platform-operator #4638
Conversation
Pipeline SummaryPipeline: operator-hosted-pipeline Tasks
Pipeline logs: https://gist.github.com/rh-operator-bundle-bot/f21f335c2fcc0087c20d68346a073c70 TroubleshootingPlease refer to the troubleshooting guide. Run |
Signed-off-by: aborshchuk <[email protected]>
d4fdc8e
to
a48d8ba
Compare
Pipeline SummaryPipeline: operator-hosted-pipeline Tasks
Pipeline logs: https://gist.github.com/rh-operator-bundle-bot/52643f0f292c9de2df35229936c1787d TroubleshootingPlease refer to the troubleshooting guide. Run |
As per #3679 , removal and modification of existing bundles is no longer supported by the community pipeline. |
@mporrato, I acknowledge the policy, but we don't just want to remove one bundle version; we want to remove the entire listing. We won't be releasing a new version of this bundle, as mentioned earlier. We don't want to list the unsupported version of our bundle on the OCP OperatorHub dashboard. How can we achieve this? |
That involves removing the existing bundles too, which is not supported. |
Do you have any solutions or advice for that? We do not want to list the old version of the bundle, which is not maintained by us anymore. |
PR needs rebase. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@hasancelik We are about to release a support of FBC (file-based catalog) for community operators where a removal action will be allowed. Would you be okay with joining the FBC once it is ready and trying to remove the operator using the new workflow? Since you want to remove the operator this could be a good candidate for FBC acceptance testing. |
@hasancelik I did an initial step to convert the operator to FBC which will allow you to remove it. Here is a PR with draft changes. Please review it and approve if you agree with the changes. Once it is approved and merged you will be able to remove the operator. |
Yes, you will be able to remove it completely from all places. Once my PR is merged you can then remove a whole content from the repository without failing a pipeline. This step will remove it from the git repo and operator hub. |
Hello @Allda I just noticed that you forgot to add 5.13.0 and 5.13.1 versions to remove. Could you please add these 2 versions:
We added 5.13.1 as a patch to notify customers that it was deprecated but since you are introduce the removal action we cat remove it completely. Thanks! |
New Hazelcast Platform Operator will be published on certified-operators and community-operators-prod is no longer maintained.
New Submissions
Your submission should not
Operator Description must contain (in order)
Operator Metadata should contain
Remember that you can preview your CSV here.
--
1 If you feel your Operator does not fit any of the pre-defined categories, file an issue against this repo and explain your need
2 For more information see here