Review Emotion Analysis

Emotion Anaylisis/IMDB/IMDB/test/neg/2085_3.txt

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+['This film very closely follows the plot of the original "classic". An all American family gets stranded in the middle of nowhere (New Mexico desert here) and are attacked by a family ravaged by nuclear radiation.I\'m no fan of the first one. I thought it was stupid, unpleasant with lousy special effects and acting. Well this one is STILL stupid but more unpleasant, the gore has been upped to an incredible degree (this was edited to get an R rating) and the acting is much better. But--that makes it harder to watch. The acting is so good that I was horrified (and not in a good way) by what I was seeing. Seeing a normal American family attacked and tortured and killed AND acting like it\'s really happening can get to you. It didn\'t scare me--it just disgusted me.Also, surprisingly, this was pretty boring. The graphic gore is in small, but powerful, doses. It\'s surrounding by boring dialogue and one endless sequence when one man wanders all over a deserted town. It\'s not creepy or chilling--just dull. It was so dull that when the violence kicked back in I was so bored it had no effect. Also a good portion of the audience walked out--in boredom.So if u liked the first one you MIGHT like this one. Otherwise--stay away. I give it a 5.']

Emotion Anaylisis/IMDB/IMDB/test/neg/2086_3.txt

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+['In the first place, I consider it a blasphemy to remake a Wes Craven movie, even one as disgusting as "The Hills Have Eyes". In the second place, the idea of nuclear tests turning people into bloodthirsty mutants - had they used it in the \'70s - could have been one of the many movies involving fear of the government (along with "The Parallax View", "Three Days of the Condor", "All the President\'s Men" and "Capricorn One").So, they not only remade a Wes Craven movie, but they used it as an excuse to show gratuitous violence. I usually really like slasher movies, but I found nothing entertaining about this one. It was just plain gross. Kathleen Quinlan and Ted Levine should have known better than this. Avoid it.As for anything about nuclear tests and their effects, just watch "The Atomic Cafe".']

Emotion Anaylisis/IMDB/IMDB/test/neg/2087_4.txt

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+["I'm a bit dissapointed: couldn't they get Mila Kunis too to complete the holy trinity? You know, Rachel Bilson, Kristen Stewart and her ... everyone is calling them that, right? No? Ok kidding aside and back to the movie though (especially because Kristen does not really have a big part here ... not that Rachel Bilson is doing much either, just saying): this is a light and entertaining affair if you suspend your disbelief with more than a stellar cast.If you can get Samuel L. Jackson to play any part in your movie ... I'd say you are good. Doug Liman directing also helps a lot. So while I wouldn't consider this a masterpiece and full of cliches and odd character traits and choices ... you can put all those aside and just enjoy the movie ... it is possible! Just do it - otherwise it is probably better not to watch the movie at all (effects have aged quite good by the way all things considering)"]

Emotion Anaylisis/IMDB/IMDB/test/neg/2095_3.txt

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+['This film tells the story of Deadpool who has to find his heart should be at, in order to get through to the woman he loves.The film does make me giggle quite a few times, especially the parachute scene which has one joke after another. It is a film that cannot be taken seriously, even though the ending tries to make it look like a film with some substance. It is more for a brainless laugh, than for an adrenaline fuelled adventure.']

Emotion Anaylisis/IMDB/IMDB/test/neg/2098_2.txt

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+['This is a well-acted horror sequel. Jessica Chastain and James McAvoy add some names and class to the gig. Steven King had a minor role as a storekeeper. As in most films, it sticks to the book in some cases while it deviates in others. The special horror effects were excellent. There were too many characters to get emotionally connected to their personal drama, although they made an effort to try as they gathered their tokens.Guide: F-word. No sex or nudity.']

Emotion Anaylisis/IMDB/IMDB/test/neg/2099_1.txt

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+["This takes place in the 1920s. Nick Carraway (Toby Maguire) narrates it from a sanitarium. It's about Jay Gatsby (Leonardo DiCaprio) who is VERY wealthy and his obsession with Daisy (Carey Mulligan). The problem is she's married to someone else.The novel is great but this movie completely trashes it. It makes ill-conceived changes in the story and goes on far too long. Also it's WAY overdone. There are endless parties at Gatsby's mansion and they're shoved in your face nonstop. A few times I had to close my eyes because there was too much going on! I saw it in 2D--in 3D it must be impossible to watch. When it isn't in your face it's deadly dull and moves at a snails pace. To make matters worse Maguire is lousy. Totally blank-faced in his role. Mulligan (who can be good) was even worse! I never got a grasp on her character or motivations. On the other hand DiCaprio was great as Gatsby. He's grown into an amazing actor. Very good-looking too. But this movie is mostly concerned with visuals--not the story. It manages the impossible--it's boring and overdone at the same time! Read the book instead."]

Emotion Anaylisis/IMDB/IMDB/test/neg/2101_2.txt

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+['I preferred this version slightly over the \'73 version although it too was great. Reasons why I preferred this was in the acting (newer slightly w/Malek & Hunnam over the prestigious McQueen & Hoffman); the locations (newest: Serbia, Malta, Montenegro over the older Hawaii, Jamaica, Spain) & definitely sets, props, costumes in the newer.\nSupposedly, Papillon the tale is at best 75% true with a large part being an aggregate of other inmates experiences. According to French records he was not imprisoned on Devil\'s Island which incidentally has nice slopping beaches; not cliffs. What was surprising to me was that this small boat made it via wind/currents from French Guiana along hundreds of miles of Atlantic ocean to the northern tip of S.A. & Colombia, and not ending up in mid-Atlantic. Supposedly Charrière "Papillon" (butterfly in french of which he carried a tattoo) tried several times to escape in his 11+ years of incarceration (imprisoned in 1933 released in 1945); spent most of his subsequent life in Venezuela; book published in 1969; died in 1973.']

Emotion Anaylisis/IMDB/IMDB/test/neg/2102_1.txt

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+["They did a remake of the incredible story of Henri Charriere Papillon. Why? I don't know. It was clearly not as good as the first one which may have had some Hollywood dramatization. This film appeared to be more gritty and realistic but knowing the ending made it anti-climatic. Not a bad production, just not as good. Guide: F-word. Brief sex. Nudity."]

Emotion Anaylisis/IMDB/IMDB/test/neg/2104_1.txt

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+["They did a remake of the incredible story of Henri Charriere Papillon. Why? I don't know. It was clearly not as good as the first one which may have had some Hollywood dramatization. This film appeared to be more gritty and realistic but knowing the ending made it anti-climatic. Not a bad production, just not as good. Guide: F-word. Brief sex. Nudity."]

Emotion Anaylisis/IMDB/IMDB/test/neg/2106_2.txt

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+["I certainly enjoyed this movie. Johnny Depp's mugging and swashbuckling. His sly expressions. The conflict with the power structure which would like to see him hanged. The special effects are quite impressive. There are two problems that kept me from giving this the ultimate rating. It is way too long. I don't know if they edited anything out of this. The thing with the ghost ship was endless. Secondly, like a video game, there were all these rules we were supposed to remember. The ones that mortals are supposed to play by and the ones the ghosts must play by. I'm starting to feel that for some films, we should be given a handbook to keep it all straight. Perhaps an in-service of some kind. When this is mostly a pirate movie, it is great fun. There are battles; there is tongue in cheek commentary. There are beautiful women who can stand up to any man; you name it. When the supernatural element enters in, it is also fun. But there's something about being forced to kill people that are already dead. Just exactly is it that you must do? Again, play by the rules. Anyway, it's a wonderful romp. It almost gets resolved in the end, and we're ready for more."]

Emotion Anaylisis/IMDB/IMDB/test/neg/2107_3.txt

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+['When the daughter of the governor of a Caribbean island, Elizabeth Swann (Keira Knightley), is proposed by Commodore Norrington (Jack Davenport), she faints, fells into the sea and is rescued and saved by the pirate Captain Jack Sparrow (Johnny Depp) but he is arrested and sentenced to death for piracy. Meanwhile, the town is attacked by the ship Black Pearl, commanded by the former first mate Barbossa (Geoffrey Rush), who leaded a mutiny against Captain Jack Sparrow years ago. Barbossa kidnaps Elizabeth, and the blacksmith Will Turner (Orlando Bloom), who loves her, releases Jack Sparrow and they steal the fastest vessel of the navy to follow the Black Pearl, Will trying to save Elizabeth, and Jack trying to retrieve his ship. Along their journey, many secrets are disclosed about the course of the Black Pearl and her crew.The supernatural adventures of Captain Jack Sparrow, Elizabeth Swann, Will Turner and Barbossa are so spectacular that really deserves to be included among the best movies (Top 250) in IMDb. This film has action, humor, romance, mystery, special effects and is so delightful that the viewer does not feel the running time of 143 minutes. I saw this movie for the first time on 24 April 2004, and I have just watched again today (10 Feb 2007) enjoying the same way as in the first time. My vote is ten.Title (Brazil): "Piratas do Caribe – A Maldição do Pérola Negra" ("Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl")']

Emotion Anaylisis/IMDB/IMDB/test/neg/2110_2.txt

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+['This was a fine but not spectacular Superman film, boosted by having Amy Adams involved.']

Emotion Anaylisis/IMDB/IMDB/test/neg/2118_4.txt

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+['For a movie that didn\'t make a whole lot of sense on a scientific level, I thought it was fairly entertaining. You just have to suspend disbelief at appropriate times, like when Millburn (Rafe Spall) tried to make nice with the cobra looking thingy, or when Shaw had her abdomen mechanically stapled and was good to go following her aliendectomy. I have to admit though, the whole concept of discovering where humanity got it\'s start left me in the dust; very confusing and not credible in the least. The alien/human DNA match was one of those one in a quadrillion shots that didn\'t pass muster with this viewer. I wasn\'t aware of this movie when it first came out, and ordered it up when I read it had something to do with the Alien franchise. So that\'s where my attention was focused the entire time, and wouldn\'t you know it, that didn\'t occur until the very end of the picture. In my case it was worth waiting for, because even if most of the story wasn\'t very credible, it still provided some cool special effects and those surreal scenes of David\'s (Michael Fassbender) disembodied head talking to Shaw. Almost as good as the first time it was done with Ian Holm in the role of Ash in the original "Alien". Hard to believe that film is almost forty years old as I write this.']

Emotion Anaylisis/IMDB/IMDB/test/neg/2124_1.txt

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+['In Los Angeles, the wealthy owner of an art gallery Susan Morrow (Amy Adams) has a loveless marriage with Hutton Morrow (Armie Hammer), who is cheating on her. Out of the blue, she receives a book manuscript from her ex-husband Edward Sheffield (Jake Gyllenhaal) entitled "Nocturne Animals" and dedicated to her. They have been divorced for nineteen years and now Edward is asking for her opinion. The novel is about a man called Tony Hastings (Jake Gyllenhaal) that is traveling on vacation by car with his wife Laura (Isla Fisher) and their teenage daughter India (Ellie Bamber) through a lonely road. Out of the blue, a car bumps their car and throws them off the-road. The troublemakers Ray Marcus (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) and Turk (Robert Aramayo) abduct Laura and India while Lou (Karl Glusman) dumps Tony in an isolated road. Tony walks to the police station and ranger Bobby Andes (Michael Shannon) finds Laura and India raped and murdered. Meanwhile Susan recalls her relationship with Edward and rekindles her love for him. "Nocturnal Animals" is a deceptive movie by Tom Ford. The overrated IMDb rating associated to the names of Amy Adams and Jake Gyllenhaal increases the deception of any viewer. Tony Hastings is a weak and unlikable character. The two segments are poorly resolved and the conclusion of each segment is awful. My vote is three.Title (Brazil): "Animais Noturnos" ("Nocturnal Animals")']

Emotion Anaylisis/IMDB/IMDB/test/neg/2141_3.txt

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+['The fact that is quirky, with just female leads and female writer and director, is the reason why the film is fun. If you would try to gender-swap it, you would get Batman and Robin without the one-liners. It makes little sense, though. From the beginning to start it is one action fest of ass kicking, but no characters that one can care about, no strategy, almost no story. Ewan McGregor\'s villain is weak and the classic cardboard psycho, so the tension is not really there. His henchman gets more screen time and is more interesting. The main character is Harley Quinn, with the "birds of prey" as secondary characters that only show their worth at the very end and frankly have little bearing on the story until then. But I would argue that what made the film more fun was Ella Jay Basco\'s unapologetic little pocket thief character.Bottom line: when the laws of physics are broken, men fall from a kick from a girl and girls get up and fight after being hit by a car and thrown into another. The film is guilty pleasure fun, but makes little sense overall.']

Emotion Anaylisis/IMDB/IMDB/test/neg/2142_1.txt

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+['The fact that is quirky, with just female leads and female writer and director, is the reason why the film is fun. If you would try to gender-swap it, you would get Batman and Robin without the one-liners. It makes little sense, though. From the beginning to start it is one action fest of ass kicking, but no characters that one can care about, no strategy, almost no story. Ewan McGregor\'s villain is weak and the classic cardboard psycho, so the tension is not really there. His henchman gets more screen time and is more interesting. The main character is Harley Quinn, with the "birds of prey" as secondary characters that only show their worth at the very end and frankly have little bearing on the story until then. But I would argue that what made the film more fun was Ella Jay Basco\'s unapologetic little pocket thief character.Bottom line: when the laws of physics are broken, men fall from a kick from a girl and girls get up and fight after being hit by a car and thrown into another. The film is guilty pleasure fun, but makes little sense overall.']

Emotion Anaylisis/IMDB/IMDB/test/neg/2153_2.txt

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+['It would seem strange for me to like a "pleasant" summer comedy, but I think this one is actually watchable and even gives laughs sometimes.  It is John Grisham meets um, should I say Clueless?  A ditzey yet very smart college girl gets dumped by her boyfriend, and figures out that if she becomes a law student and perhaps even a laywer, she might win him back (even after she realizes he\'s engaged).  Clumsy at times and of course cliched (aren\'t they all nowadays), but also fun in a brainless dead-zone way. B']

Emotion Anaylisis/IMDB/IMDB/test/neg/2162_4.txt

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+['This film tells the story of a man in the 1820\'s, who sets out with a group of men for a fur trading expedition. He is attacked by a bear, then left for dead by his men. After he witnessed his son being killed, he sets on a long journey to live for revenge.There is so much buzz around "The Revenant" so I had high hopes for it. However, I was thoroughly disappointed after just ten minutes. It is excessively violent and graphically gory. I think there is no need for ten minutes of fighting and five minutes of bear attack, when one minute each is already enough to convey the message. Most scenes drag on and on, what could have been told in ten seconds are often dragged to minutes long.Another thing that I dislike is the fact that all actors have long unkempt hair, covering most of their faces. This makes character recognition an intense mental challenge! Thirdly, the story is not engaging or interesting. It only involves Leonardo walking around in snow most of the time. There is nothing to captivate me. I watched the whole 2.5 hours of "The Revenant", and I was thoroughly bored.']

Emotion Anaylisis/IMDB/IMDB/test/neg/2163_2.txt

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+["What was all the hype about regarding this colossal miserable film?The film starts off too brutal for me with the Indians on the rampage, killing off many of the traders.Am still wondering why Leonardo Di Caprio won the best actor Oscar for this film? He gave many other much better performances in other films. The choice was ridiculous.The one shining spot of this horrible film was the supporting performance by Tom Hardy as the villain, who justified his evil ways by way of religion.This basically comes down to revenge and it's amazing that DiCaprio could ever survive the mauling by that bear to regain the stamina needed to track down Hardy, who had killed his son in the interim.Yes, the scenery is unusual but it best reflects the mood of the entire film."]

Emotion Anaylisis/IMDB/IMDB/test/neg/2169_4.txt

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+['We are constantly being reminded that we can\'t understand movies if we are not into cgi (computer generated images). Well, that doesn\'t work for me. That\'s like saying a black light Elvis picture is true art because I don\'t appreciate black felt. Movies are good because they have a story to tell, not because they are endless eye candy. The convoluted nature of this film, taking every random horror element possible, just doesn\'t work. This is too bad. I think Hugh Jackman is a really charismatic actor. It\'s just that they throw so much against the wall to see what sticks. Maybe if, like video games, the movie came with a manual, explaining the rules that each character can play by, it would be helpful. Some can die; oops, I guess they can\'t. Some can fly; oops, I guess not. How do you kill those already dead? I am a big fan of the classic horror genre. When I saw the trailer to this at another film, I was really excited. I thought maybe a young Van Helsing would be a little more cerebral. He is just kind of a supernatural bounty hunter who goes on and on and on. Where does he find the energy. Personally I like the guy with the thick glasses who is not afraid to look into the eyes of Lugosi\'s Dracula and tell him off. "There are things worse than death, Mr. Van Helsing!" Dracula says. Maybe this movie is one of them.']

Emotion Anaylisis/IMDB/IMDB/test/neg/2173_3.txt

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+['Jojo Rabbit (Roman Griffin Davis) is part of the Trump Youth Group. He is a ten-year-old boy who likes to dress up, be part of the club and play Nazi. Hitler (Taika Waititi) is his imaginary friend. As the war closes in on Berlin, he discovers a Jew (Thomasin McKenzie) hidden in the closet. His mother (Scarlett Johansson) is part of the resistance.The film depicts the Germans in a comic fashion similar to "Hogan\'s Heroes." In spite of the dark background, the film is mostly light. Sam Rockwell gives us a comical performance.Guide: No swearing, sex, or nudity.']