Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
deploy: 8d76c0a
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
rafaelpsilva07 committed Oct 10, 2024
1 parent d33c884 commit a4b44a2
Showing 1 changed file with 3 additions and 3 deletions.
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions notebooks/Critical_buckling_verification_study.html
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ <h1>Critical Buckling Verification Study<a class="headerlink" href="#Critical-Bu
<div class="section" id="Simply-Supported-study-case-(SSSS)">
<h2>Simply Supported study case (SSSS)<a class="headerlink" href="#Simply-Supported-study-case-(SSSS)" title="Permalink to this heading">#</a></h2>
<p>This study case aims to verify the Rayleigh-Ritz implementation made with Composipy (Silva, R.P. 2023). Mathematical verification of the Rayleigh-Ritz implementation is made against analytical buckling equation and FEM model. The benchmarking example is a simply supported plate with biaxial load, which considers a quasi-isotropic layup [(45/-45)2/02/902]s and properties according Table below. This example came from Kassapoglou (2010).</p>
<p><img alt="fe4f0aa2f18e4cdd9592147b595f215f" class="no-scaled-link" src="../_images/mechanical_prop_verification_problem.png" style="width: 400px; height: 200px;" /></p>
<p><img alt="5aa94132ff79465096df07602bbc16b4" class="no-scaled-link" src="../_images/mechanical_prop_verification_problem.png" style="width: 400px; height: 200px;" /></p>
<p>Dimension of the square plate is 100 mm and the load ratio (𝑁𝑦/𝑁𝑥) is 0.5. Analytical solution for this problem using Equation below is 234.7 N/mm.</p>
<div class="math notranslate nohighlight">
\[\lambda = \pi^2\frac{[D_{11}m^4 +2(D_{12}+2D_{66})m^2n^2(a/b)^2 + D_{22}n^4(a/b)^4 ]}{a^2 (m^2 + (N_{x}/N_{y}) n^2 (a/b)^2)}\]</div>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ <h2>Simply Supported study case (SSSS)<a class="headerlink" href="#Simply-Suppor
<div class="section" id="Different-boundary-conditions">
<h2>Different boundary conditions<a class="headerlink" href="#Different-boundary-conditions" title="Permalink to this heading">#</a></h2>
<p>Table below extends the study for different boundary conditions in order to verify polynomial functions presented in section 2.1.3. The results are verified against a NASTRAN FEM model and the maximum difference is 0.7%. Table 6 presents the first buckling mode deformation shape.</p>
<p><img alt="3ec271be613d4322b3c134699f3ab763" class="no-scaled-link" src="../_images/first_eigenvalue_BC.png" style="height: 150px;" /></p>
<p><img alt="7779450285c4448b8bc5d2acc3c3732d" class="no-scaled-link" src="../_images/first_eigenvalue_BC.png" style="height: 150px;" /></p>
<div class="section" id="Clamped-study-case-(CCCC)">
<h3>Clamped study case (CCCC)<a class="headerlink" href="#Clamped-study-case-(CCCC)" title="Permalink to this heading">#</a></h3>
<div class="nbinput docutils container">
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ <h3>Simply supported with one free edge study case (SSSC)<a class="headerlink" h
</div>
<div class="section" id="Comparison-with-NASTRAN-deformed-shape">
<h3>Comparison with NASTRAN deformed shape<a class="headerlink" href="#Comparison-with-NASTRAN-deformed-shape" title="Permalink to this heading">#</a></h3>
<p><img alt="942fb73ef4a84d82961047e4d22b80f0" class="no-scaled-link" src="../_images/Nastran_deformed.png" style="width: 600px;" /></p>
<p><img alt="f3600a03038a4f9589329eda20c844e6" class="no-scaled-link" src="../_images/Nastran_deformed.png" style="width: 600px;" /></p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="section" id="References">
Expand Down

0 comments on commit a4b44a2

Please sign in to comment.