avoid commented-out code (ruff-ERA)

[XzzX]

Some of the pieces are commented well, however, since we cannot quarantee good comments I suggest avoiding commented-out code entirely to avoid confusion.

[github-actions]

👈 Launch a binder notebook on branch pyiron/pyiron_workflow/ruff-era

[codacy-production]

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
✅ +0.00% (target: -1.00%)	✅ ∅

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (53a5c14)	3356	3070	91.48%
Head commit (c683038)	3356 (+0)	3070 (+0)	91.48% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#545)	0	0	∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

_{Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more}

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 12794832937

Details

• 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage remained the same at 91.478%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 12773583061:	0.0%
Covered Lines:	3070
Relevant Lines:	3356

---

💛 - Coveralls

[liamhuber]

Yeah, sounds good to me. Where the commented code was intentional to highlight something, I just replaced it with an equivalent english statement. Otherwise I went in and resolved the remaining complains by a combination of deletion and uncommenting