-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Change representation of PrivateKey to not use String #452
Conversation
Thanks for your work. First glance looks fine to me, however I am currently on vacation and only have a phone with me ;) I can have another look at some point next week, sorry for the slow response. @gvolpe any thoughts? I think this is binary breaking as it changes the public interface of |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for your work, some remarks/questions from my side. Again sorry for the delay.
@froth I leave it up to you guys, I don't use this library at all these days, don't wait for my review :) |
Co-authored-by: Frederick Roth <[email protected]>
@hunterpayne thanks for your work. I like the changes and will try and merge them today. I will most likely have to change the base branch to series/2.0. I will try to change your pull request to reflect that, if I don't have the permissions to do so I will have to ask you to do that. |
Changing the JwtSecretKey class to use an Array of Characters, byte array or PrivateKey.