-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 69
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor(eddsa-poseidon)!: restrict message types #318
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
refactor(eddsa-poseidon)!: restrict message types #318
Conversation
BREAKING CHANGE: message type re privacy-scaling-explorations#230
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @f3r10 for this PR.
Looks like you need to fix the error message in your test.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this change needs to include functional code not just types and tests. In particular the checkMessage function is where the input needs to be validated and converted appropriately.
Also welcome to the team and thanks for picking up this PR. I'm a thorough and detail-oriented reviewer. Don't take that as being unwelcoming. :)
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ | |||
import { Point } from "@zk-kit/baby-jubjub" | |||
import type { BigNumberish } from "@zk-kit/utils" | |||
import { type BigNumberish } from "@zk-kit/utils" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I honestly don't know what this type
keyword is for. The build works fine for me locally if I simply remove it entirely, so I suggest doing that if it passes the GitHub checks.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Imports could be values or types. TS can infer what kind of import that is but the type
keyword here makes it more explicit.
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ export function derivePublicKey(privateKey: Buffer | Uint8Array | string): Point | |||
* @param message The message to be signed. | |||
* @returns The signature object, containing properties relevant to EdDSA signatures, such as 'R8' and 'S' values. | |||
*/ | |||
export function signMessage(privateKey: Buffer | Uint8Array | string, message: BigNumberish): Signature<bigint> { | |||
export function signMessage(privateKey: Buffer | Uint8Array | string, message: BigNumber): Signature<bigint> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe the intent here is to change not only the types but the handling and checking of the inputs here. A BigNumber is limited to bigint or a stringified bigint (not an arbitrary string, not a buffer). The checkMessage function is the place where you should be checking that and converting to bigint appropriately.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also per @cedoor's comment on #230 there should be some documentation above about the fact that the message is a single BabyJub field element, represented as a bigint. Best-practice for users with other types of input is probably to hash it (e.g. with a poseidon hash), or encode their inputs bytes directly if small enough (e.g. using bufferToBigInt()).
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ describe("EdDSAPoseidon", () => { | |||
it("Should sign a message (hexadecimal)", async () => { | |||
const message = "0x12" | |||
|
|||
const signature = signMessage(privateKey, message) | |||
const signature = signMessage(privateKey, BigInt(message)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a stringified bigint, so should be accepted as a BigNumber without explicit conversion.
I also suggest adding another test case with a decimal string like "123" which should also work. Anything parsable by BigInt(s) should work.
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ describe("EdDSAPoseidon", () => { | |||
expect(signature.S).toBe(circomlibSignature.S) | |||
}) | |||
|
|||
it("Should sign a message (string)", async () => { | |||
it("Should sign a message if less than 32 bytes (string)", async () => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this case shouldn't be supported without an explicit conversion to bigint
const message = bufferToBigInt(Buffer.from(crypto.getRandomValues(34))) | ||
|
||
const fun = () => signMessage(privateKey, message) | ||
expect(fun).toThrow("Size 32 is too small, need at least 33 bytes") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This test is failing on GitHub
awesome!! thanks @artwyman for your feedback. I am going to work through your comments right away. |
Hi @f3r10, are you still going to work on this? |
My apologies, @cedoor. I started a new job and have been really busy. I hope to contribute once I settle into it. |
Description
The type supported for the EdDSA message has been reduced to BigNumber (either bigint or string which must still be a stringified bigint))
Related Issue(s)
Closes #230
Checklist
yarn style
without getting any errors