Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

react-daterangepicker Upgrade to SPFx 1.20.0 #5293

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 13, 2024
Merged

Conversation

dgirase
Copy link
Contributor

@dgirase dgirase commented Oct 7, 2024

  • New sample
  • Bug fix/update
  • Related issues: fixes #X, partially #Y, mentioned in #Z

What's in this Pull Request?

react-daterangepicker Upgrade to SPFx 1.20.0

Node Version

v18.20.2

Node version used:

Checklist

This checklist is used to automatically pre-process your pull request; It is meant to help process pull requests in a timely manner, rather than hoops to jump through.

Put an x in all the items that apply ([x], no spaces between the [, the x, and the ] ). Make notes next to any that haven't been addressed.

  • My pull request affects only ONE sample.
  • My sample builds without any warnings
  • I have updated the README.md file's Version history. For new samples, created a new README.md file matching this template
  • My README.md has at least one static high-resolution screenshot (i.e. not a GIF) located in the assets folder.
  • My README.md contains complete setup instructions, including pre-requisites and permissions required
  • My solution includes a .nvmrc file indicating the version of Node.js

@Adam-it Adam-it self-assigned this Oct 8, 2024
@hugoabernier hugoabernier merged commit c53d440 into pnp:main Oct 13, 2024
2 checks passed
@hugoabernier
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you @dgirase for your update! Much appreciated!.

Thank you for sharing your sample with others - you rock! 👏🥇👩‍💻

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants