Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UART: Label UARTs, disambiguate Pi4-only, for #428 #431

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Gadgetoid
Copy link
Collaborator

Add an new "supported:" property to overlay pins in order to declare which Pi versions this feature is supported on.

Add an new "supported:" property to overlay pins in order to declare which Pi versions this feature is supported on.
@Gadgetoid Gadgetoid mentioned this pull request Oct 26, 2021
direction: output
active: high
supported: Pi4
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If there was a feature which was only supported on Pi2 and Pi3 (there isn't - I'm just playing devil's advocate), I guess using supported: Pi2 and Pi3 should work okay? (although would obviously look a bit weird in translated versions of the site!)

@@ -8,77 +8,91 @@ url: http://elinux.org/RPi_Serial_Connection
pincount: 18
pin:
'8':
name: TXD / Transmit
name: UART0/1 TXD
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also CTS5 on Pi4 only, just to confuse things further! 🤣
(but AFAIK most people don't use CTS and RTS, so this can probably be safely ignored?)

@ukaea-chah
Copy link

Any reason not to merge this? It would be really helpful when dealing with mutliple UARTs on the Pi4.

@Gadgetoid
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This will be made redundant by explicit separation of boards in the rewrite of Pinout - pinout-xyz/pinout-2024#1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants