-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 183
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[tests-only][full-ci] add test to check activities of destination file and folder by moving a file using file-id #10409
Open
prashant-gurung899
wants to merge
1
commit into
master
Choose a base branch
from
tests-move-activities-by-fileid
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+809
−3
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is it required? and why
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, because for following scenario we have to directly rename the file during the MOVE request:
In this particular step:
If we didn't do it then it would return
204
instead of201
See: https://drone.owncloud.com/owncloud/ocis/40432/38/5
cc @saw-jan
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hmm, I think there should be another better way. I know these steps are confusing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, what's happening is that:
What we already have is:
And for the steps like:
we are not appending the
file name
after the container i.e.,folder name
(like this: newFolder/textfile.txt). So, it gives:But for scenarios like:
we are already appending the
file name
after the container i.e.,folder name
(like this: New Folder/textfile.txt). So it gives:which is not expected.
So
EITHER
we can modify the
copy
steps; appending thefile name
after container and we can totally omit above mentioned code snippetOR
we can modify the
move
steps; removing thefile name
after container and we can have the existing above mentioned code snippetOR
we can go with changes made in this PR
OR we should dig more to find another solution
cc @saw-jan
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think, modifying the
copy
steps and omitting the snippet :will be a better choice because in other test cases also, the
file name
is appended after its container like:ocis/tests/acceptance/features/coreApiFavorites/favorites.feature
Line 154 in 5fc891c
And also there is only one scenario for
copy
using the method (userHasCopiedOrMovedFileInsideSpaceUsingFileId
) that contains above snippet.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IMO, the scenario steps need to be written clearly.
Example: