Note on usage:
ompy is loaded in as a submode. Remember to initialize recursively if you want to
use submodules within the submodule: git submodule update --init --recursive
Rendering jupyter notebooks:
If you have problems rendering the notebooks directly on git, try accessing them via nbviewer
: https://nbviewer.jupyter.org/github/oslocyclotronlab/ompy_further_examples/tree/master/
Comparison of unfolding with ompy and mama. Contains three datasets:
- 145Nd: Comparison of unfolded data + of folded to raw
- 145Nd_artificial: Created a fake raw spectrum with
raw_fake = R * raw
and unfold this - 28Si: Comparison of unfolded data + of folded to raw
- folding_efficiency: Check the effect of the efficiency normalization vs normalizing the response
R
to 1 for each row; otherwise similar idea to145Nd_artificial
Get primaries from all generation spectra and compare to the tru primaries:
- Simple spectrum, idea from Ann-Cecilie (Larsen2011)
- Other simple mock spectra
Compare different ways to estimate the uncertainty: Either estimate it directly after decomposition, or normalize each ensemble member separately
A small check on whether the unfolding and first generation method are linear or not. They turn out not to be linear.
- unfolding_fbu: A first test run to show that we can now (easily) use different unfolding algorithms, like fully bayesian unfolding. The priors and other sampler parameters are probably not chosen very smart in this case -- I just wanted to see whether it works in general. And it does so.