-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release-4.17] OCPBUGS-44226: PowerVS: Fix MissingSecurityGroupRules #9175
[release-4.17] OCPBUGS-44226: PowerVS: Fix MissingSecurityGroupRules #9175
Conversation
When the user provides an existing VPC, the IBM CAPI will not add ports 443, 5000, and 6443 to the VPC's security group. It is safe to always check for these ports since we only add them if they are missing.
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-44068 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-44226. Will retitle bug to link to clone. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-44226, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
Hello @gpei |
/label cherry-pick-approved |
/assign @r4f4 |
/lgtm |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: r4f4 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/jira refresh |
@hamzy: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-44226, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/label backport-risk-assessed |
/test e2e-powervs-ovn |
/jira refresh |
@hamzy: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-44226, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
7a79a4d
into
openshift:release-4.17
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-44226: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-44226 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
This is an automated cherry-pick of #9163
/assign hamzy