-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 471
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ingress: Add dynamic-config-manager enhancement #1687
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
ingress: Add dynamic-config-manager enhancement #1687
Conversation
* enhancements/ingress/dynamic-config-manager.md: New file.
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@Miciah: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
override: | ||
|
||
```shell | ||
oc -n openshift-ingress-operator patch ingresscontrollers/default --type=merge --patch='{"spec":{"unsupportedConfigOverrides":{"dynamicConfigManager":"false"}}}' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For upgrades, I assume you need to remove the unsupported override and re-enable it once the upgrade is complete. However, this raises the question: if DCM is re-enabled, does that imply the cluster may be broken from an ingress perspective until the update is complete and DCM can be disabled again? Is that going to be an acceptable stance for production clusters?
/assign @alebedev87 |
No description provided.