-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 471
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature: OpenShift Virtualization Higher Density #1679
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Hi @iholder101. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a openshift member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
||
#### Timeline | ||
|
||
* GA higher workload density in OpenShift Virtualization in 2024 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is this timeline still accurate?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I believe it is.
Please keep me honest @stu-gott.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@haircommander Hi, I've checked the Jira planning, we are on track, so yes this is indeed accurate.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@haircommander The timeline bullet GA higher workload density in OpenShift Virtualization in 2024
relates to the phase 1 only. Maybe we should add it in brackets
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @haircommander!
@enp0s3 and I reworked the PR. Can you please have another look?
/ok-to-test |
A feature describing CNV's path to higher density based on - phase 1: wasp - phase 2: kube swap Signed-off-by: Itamar Holder <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Itamar Holder <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Itamar Holder <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Itamar Holder <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Itamar Holder <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Itamar Holder <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Itamar Holder <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Itamar Holder <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Itamar Holder <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Itamar Holder <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Itamar Holder <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Itamar Holder <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Itamar Holder <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Itamar Holder <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Itamar Holder <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Itamar Holder <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Itamar Holder <[email protected]>
e7d1686
to
a30cc7c
Compare
@iholder101: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Inactive enhancement proposals go stale after 28d of inactivity. See https://github.com/openshift/enhancements#life-cycle for details. Mark the proposal as fresh by commenting If this proposal is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle stale |
Stale enhancement proposals rot after 7d of inactivity. See https://github.com/openshift/enhancements#life-cycle for details. Mark the proposal as fresh by commenting If this proposal is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle rotten |
A feature describing OpenShift Virtualization's path to higher density based on:
This is a replacement for #1630.