Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix/logstash indexing #1117

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 6, 2024
Merged

Fix/logstash indexing #1117

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 6, 2024

Conversation

makelicious
Copy link
Collaborator

Issue:

  1. Logstash was unable to index logs to elasticsearch.
  2. On version 8, elasticsearch became ECS compliant by default.
  3. This caused the accepted payload to change. The 400 error went unnoticed. Most likely since we re use logstash to deliver those to us.

Solution:

  1. Rename host to host.name in order to follow ECS
  2. Add ecs-logstash index to config.ndjson to read errors from.

@makelicious makelicious added this to the v1.6.0 milestone Sep 6, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 6, 2024

Oops! Looks like you forgot to update the changelog. When updating CHANGELOG.md, please consider the following:

  • Changelog is read by country implementors who might not always be familiar with all technical details of OpenCRVS. Keep language high-level, user friendly and avoid technical references to internals.
  • Answer "What's new?", "Why was the change made?" and "Why should I care?" for each change.
  • If it's a breaking change, include a migration guide answering "What do I need to do to upgrade?".

@makelicious makelicious changed the title Fix/logstash indexing fj Fix/logstash indexing Sep 6, 2024
@makelicious makelicious merged commit e1f37fa into develop Sep 6, 2024
2 checks passed
makelicious added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants