Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Auto label CI: fix permissions #9514

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 21, 2024

Conversation

Rustix69
Copy link
Contributor

@Rustix69 Rustix69 commented Dec 20, 2024

Proposed Changes

Assigned by : @rithviknishad

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated workflow configuration for auto-labeling merge conflicts, improving repository management.

@Rustix69 Rustix69 requested a review from a team as a code owner December 20, 2024 06:19
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 20, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the GitHub Actions workflow configuration for auto-labeling merge conflicts. The workflow is specifically configured for the ohcnetwork/care_fe repository, adding a contents: read permission. It uses the prince-chrismc/label-merge-conflicts-action@v2 to detect and label merge conflicts, with a predefined comment template to notify the author about potential rebasing requirements.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/label-merge-conflict.yml Added contents: read permission, conditioned job to run only for ohcnetwork/care_fe repository

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Auto label merge conflicts [#9411]

Poem

🐰 Merge conflicts, oh what a sight!
A workflow that keeps our branches tight
With labels bright and comments clear
Rebasing becomes a path without fear
Code harmony, our rabbit's delight! 🔧


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 20, 2024

Deploy Preview for care-ohc ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit a00502c
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/care-ohc/deploys/67650c8ac0f1000008eae414
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-9514--care-ohc.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
.github/workflows/label-merge-conflict.yml (1)

Update action version to v3.0.4 for improved stability and features

The workflow is currently using prince-chrismc/label-merge-conflicts-action@v2, but version 3.0.4 is now available. The newer version includes improvements and bug fixes. There are no open issues reported for v2 or v3.

  • Update the action version in .github/workflows/label-merge-conflict.yml:
    - uses: prince-chrismc/label-merge-conflicts-action@v3
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 18-18: Verify the action version and configuration

Let's ensure we're using the latest stable version of the action and check for any known issues.


Let me check the actual version being used in the workflow file before making the final response.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the latest version and issues for prince-chrismc/label-merge-conflicts-action

# Get latest release version
echo "Latest release version:"
gh api repos/prince-chrismc/label-merge-conflicts-action/releases/latest --jq .tag_name

# Check for open issues related to v2
echo -e "\nRelevant open issues:"
gh api search/issues -X GET -f q="repo:prince-chrismc/label-merge-conflicts-action is:issue is:open label:bug v2" --jq '.items[].title'

Length of output: 350


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the version specified in the workflow file
cat .github/workflows/label-merge-conflict.yml

Length of output: 776

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/label-merge-conflict.yml (1)

Line range hint 14-29: Consider enhancing the conflict notification message

While the current configuration is solid, the conflict notification message could be more helpful by including:

  1. Steps or documentation links for rebasing
  2. Contact information for getting help

Consider updating the comment template:

           conflict_comment: |
             :wave: Hi, @${author},
-            Conflicts have been detected against the base branch. Please rebase your branch against the base branch.
+            Conflicts have been detected against the base branch. Please follow these steps to resolve the conflicts:
+            
+            1. Fetch the latest changes: `git fetch origin develop`
+            2. Rebase your branch: `git rebase origin/develop`
+            3. Resolve any conflicts
+            4. Force push your changes: `git push --force-with-lease`
+            
+            Need help? Contact the development team in the #dev-support channel.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 213e114 and a00502c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/label-merge-conflict.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/label-merge-conflict.yml (2)

3-6: LGTM! Appropriate permissions configuration

The addition of contents: read permission follows the principle of least privilege and is necessary for the action to function correctly.


Line range hint 8-12: LGTM! Appropriate event triggers

The workflow triggers on both push and pull_request events targeting the develop branch, ensuring timely detection of merge conflicts.

@rithviknishad rithviknishad changed the title Added Contents Auto label CI: fix permissions Dec 20, 2024
@rithviknishad rithviknishad requested a review from sainak December 20, 2024 06:37
@rithviknishad rithviknishad merged commit 0a14155 into ohcnetwork:develop Dec 21, 2024
30 checks passed
Copy link

@Rustix69 Your efforts have helped advance digital healthcare and TeleICU systems. 🚀 Thank you for taking the time out to make CARE better. We hope you continue to innovate and contribute; your impact is immense! 🙌

@Rustix69 Rustix69 deleted the bug/auto-label-failures branch January 14, 2025 06:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Auto label failures
2 participants