fix typo #2747
fix typo #2747
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces a subtle modification to the deployment workflow configuration by changing the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/deploy.yml(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: test / test
- GitHub Check: Analyze (python)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/deploy.yml (1)
Line range hint
165-183: Verify recent deployment history with the new service name.This service name is used in critical deployment steps. It would be absolutely wonderful if we could confirm that recent deployments have been successful with the new name
"care".Let's check the deployment history:
✅ Verification successful
Service names are properly configured, but I suppose we could have used a more creative name than just "care"
The workflow file shows consistent use of service names:
ECS_SERVICE_BACKEND: "care"ECS_SERVICE_CELERY: "care-celery"- Both services deploy to cluster:
ECS_CLUSTER: "egov"The service names are correctly referenced in both task definition downloads and deployment steps. While we can't verify the actual deployment history (AWS CLI isn't available in our environment), the configuration itself is sound and follows best practices with proper error handling.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check recent deployments for this service # This helps verify if the new name has been working aws ecs describe-services \ --cluster egov \ --services care \ --query 'services[].events[?contains(message, `deployment`)]|[0:5].message'Length of output: 228
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for service name references and env vars in workflow files fd -e yml -e yaml . .github/workflows/ --exec-batch grep -l "ECS_SERVICE\|service:\|cluster:" {} \; | xargs cat # Also check if there are any env files that might define these variables fd -g "*.env*" . --exec-batch grep -l "ECS_SERVICE\|ECS_CLUSTER" {} \; | xargs cat || trueLength of output: 7135
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2747 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 60.49% 60.49%
========================================
Files 252 252
Lines 12707 12707
Branches 1111 1111
========================================
Hits 7687 7687
Misses 4951 4951
Partials 69 69 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
fixed typo in ECS_SERVICE_BACKEND value that broke the deploy.
Summary by CodeRabbit